Self-reported knowledge attitude and practice of healthcare professionals in the management of infection and antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review
Ghosh, I.; Adedunmola, A.; Alkan, E.; Adetunji, V.; Web, C.; Anyanwu, P.; Johnson, S.; Gilham, E.; Ashiru-Oredope, D.; Ayorinde, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis review aims to synthesise studies on health and social care professionals (HCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding infection management, infection prevention and control, antimicrobial use, stewardship, and resistance to inform future research and policy. MethodIn January 2024, we conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify studies on health and social care professionals KAP regarding infection management, prevention and control, antimicrobial use, stewardship, and resistance. After deduplication, the initial screening was conducted in Rayyan, with 10% checked for accuracy. Two reviewers independently assessed full texts. Data extraction was performed by one and verified by another reviewer. Quality assessment was completed by one reviewer, with 20% checked for accuracy. We included relevant studies published from 2016 onwards focusing on those conducted in the UK and in countries with comparable settings. Finally, a narrative synthesis was carried out due to significant differences between studies. ResultsOut of 10,990 unique records identified, 113 studies with diverse participants and settings were included. The findings showed substantial variation in KAP measures, complicating direct comparisons between studies. Some studies assessed objective knowledge(N=40) while most measured perceived knowledge(N=41), revelling discrepancies between the two. Attitude assessments revealed widespread consensus on the harms of inappropriate antimicrobial use, though willingness to participate in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities varied by profession. Practice behaviour assessment indicated varying hand-hygiene compliance and AMS implementation, along with significant concerns about inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. ConclusionThe review highlights significant gaps in healthcare professionals KAP regarding infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship, with variations across professions. This underscores the need for targeted interventions. Additionally, standardised KAP assessment measures are essential to enhance comparability across different contexts. These findings provide a foundation for future research and policy initiatives aimed at combating AMR.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions, views and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing and stewardship among hospital physicians in Jakarta, Indonesia 96%
- Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers' views 94%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of Bacterial Coinfection and Patterns of Antibiotics Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis 94%
- Antimicrobial use in laboratory rodent facilities in Australia and New Zealand- a cross-sectional survey of veterinarians and facility managers 94%
- Assessment of knowledge and perception of prescribers towards rational medicine use in the Ashanti Region of Ghana 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 95%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 94%
- Behavior-change interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in human health, animal health, and livestock agriculture: A systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 93%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.