Back

Self-reported knowledge attitude and practice of healthcare professionals in the management of infection and antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review

Ghosh, I.; Adedunmola, A.; Alkan, E.; Adetunji, V.; Web, C.; Anyanwu, P.; Johnson, S.; Gilham, E.; Ashiru-Oredope, D.; Ayorinde, A.

2025-04-28 public and global health
10.1101/2025.04.28.25324348 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThis review aims to synthesise studies on health and social care professionals (HCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding infection management, infection prevention and control, antimicrobial use, stewardship, and resistance to inform future research and policy. MethodIn January 2024, we conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identify studies on health and social care professionals KAP regarding infection management, prevention and control, antimicrobial use, stewardship, and resistance. After deduplication, the initial screening was conducted in Rayyan, with 10% checked for accuracy. Two reviewers independently assessed full texts. Data extraction was performed by one and verified by another reviewer. Quality assessment was completed by one reviewer, with 20% checked for accuracy. We included relevant studies published from 2016 onwards focusing on those conducted in the UK and in countries with comparable settings. Finally, a narrative synthesis was carried out due to significant differences between studies. ResultsOut of 10,990 unique records identified, 113 studies with diverse participants and settings were included. The findings showed substantial variation in KAP measures, complicating direct comparisons between studies. Some studies assessed objective knowledge(N=40) while most measured perceived knowledge(N=41), revelling discrepancies between the two. Attitude assessments revealed widespread consensus on the harms of inappropriate antimicrobial use, though willingness to participate in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities varied by profession. Practice behaviour assessment indicated varying hand-hygiene compliance and AMS implementation, along with significant concerns about inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. ConclusionThe review highlights significant gaps in healthcare professionals KAP regarding infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship, with variations across professions. This underscores the need for targeted interventions. Additionally, standardised KAP assessment measures are essential to enhance comparability across different contexts. These findings provide a foundation for future research and policy initiatives aimed at combating AMR.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
17.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.9%
3
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%