Back

Structure of active methyl-CoM reductase, Earth's main methane producer

Ohmer, C. J.; Abernathy, M. J.; Marchany-Rivera, D.; Villareal, D. G.; Simon, P. S.; Lyubimov, A.; Bhowmick, A.; Chatterjee, K.; Makita, H.; Tiwari, V.; Dasgupta, M.; Keable, S.; Mittan-Moreau, D.; Paley, D. W.; Moriarty, N. W.; Sanchez, H.; Rosenberg, D. J.; Gee, L. B.; Alonso-Mori, R.; Sauter, N. K.; Brewster, A. S.; Bergmann, U.; Yachandra, V. K.; Cohen, A. E.; Yano, J.; Kern, J.; Sarangi, R.; Ragsdale, S. W.

2025-04-27 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.04.26.650772 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Our work reveals the structure of the active state of Methyl-Coenzyme M Reductase (MCR), the key and rate-limiting enzyme in biological methane formation. We find large differences between the active Ni(I) and inactive Ni(II) proteins and provide insight into how nature makes and breaks the C-H bond of methane. The Ni(II)-F430 center in inactive MCR contains four planar nitrogen ligands, a lower axial glutamine oxo, and an upper axial thiolate. The Ni(I)-enzyme replaces the axial ligands with a single water. The one-electron redox change results in movement of the Ni ion and upward swing of the {beta}-lactam ring in the tetrapyrrole coupled to a domino-like protein quake through second sphere residues, inter-subunit interactions, a substrate tunnel, affecting even the dimensions of the unit cell. These structural changes lead Ni(I)-MCR to release a charge clamp that, in the Ni(II) state, locks down substrate Coenzyme B. Determining the Ni(I)-MCR structure required development of rigorous anaerobic crystallographic techniques. Validation of the MCR redox state was accomplished by in-line and parallel spectroscopic and unit cell analyses. This structure has large implications for developing technologies to limit methane emissions and efficiently produce biofuels. Methodology described here will enhance structural biology for other oxygen-sensitive enzymes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.