Back

Adherence Risk Stratification in Physiatry: A Multivariate Analysis of Factors in Community-Based Care Using Algorithmic Modeling Techniques

Trinh, H.; Kounang, R.

2025-04-28 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.04.26.25326474 medRxiv
Show abstract

Missed appointments represent a double-edged sword in community health settings. Policies designed to retain patients and ensure continuity of care for vulnerable populations often mean that discharging patients is rare, even in cases of frequent no-shows. However, this retention strains healthcare resources, disrupts workflows, and exacerbates inequities in access to care. In physiatry (PM&R), where rehabilitation outcomes depend on consistent patient engagement, missed visits further hinder progress, delaying recovery and diminishing quality of life. Addressing appointment adherence in these settings is paramount for equitable and efficient care delivery. This study evaluated appointment adherence using EPIC-derived general risk scores (demographics, clinical history, and other individual-level factors) and preventative gap scores (compliance with recommended preventative care guidelines). To add granularity, demographic variables such as age, sex, and race/ethnicity--Social Drivers of Health (SDOH) factors embedded within these risk scores--were further analyzed as an additional layer to identify structural and systemic barriers influencing patient engagement. A Residual Deep Neural Network (RDNN) was developed, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.997, recall of 0.988, F1-score of 0.987, and accuracy of 0.980. A Deep Neural Network with Attention (DNNA) was introduced for interpretability, offering opportunities to refine and extend RDNNs predictive performance. It demonstrated a 5.7x improvement over a clamped baseline for no-show risk prediction. These findings emphasize the strengths of combining RDNNs robust predictive capabilities with DNNAs ability to model nuanced relationships. Together, they provide a pathway to optimize appointment adherence and enhance equitable care delivery in community health and PM&R settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
6
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
9
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
16
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%