Adherence Risk Stratification in Physiatry: A Multivariate Analysis of Factors in Community-Based Care Using Algorithmic Modeling Techniques
Trinh, H.; Kounang, R.
Show abstract
Missed appointments represent a double-edged sword in community health settings. Policies designed to retain patients and ensure continuity of care for vulnerable populations often mean that discharging patients is rare, even in cases of frequent no-shows. However, this retention strains healthcare resources, disrupts workflows, and exacerbates inequities in access to care. In physiatry (PM&R), where rehabilitation outcomes depend on consistent patient engagement, missed visits further hinder progress, delaying recovery and diminishing quality of life. Addressing appointment adherence in these settings is paramount for equitable and efficient care delivery. This study evaluated appointment adherence using EPIC-derived general risk scores (demographics, clinical history, and other individual-level factors) and preventative gap scores (compliance with recommended preventative care guidelines). To add granularity, demographic variables such as age, sex, and race/ethnicity--Social Drivers of Health (SDOH) factors embedded within these risk scores--were further analyzed as an additional layer to identify structural and systemic barriers influencing patient engagement. A Residual Deep Neural Network (RDNN) was developed, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.997, recall of 0.988, F1-score of 0.987, and accuracy of 0.980. A Deep Neural Network with Attention (DNNA) was introduced for interpretability, offering opportunities to refine and extend RDNNs predictive performance. It demonstrated a 5.7x improvement over a clamped baseline for no-show risk prediction. These findings emphasize the strengths of combining RDNNs robust predictive capabilities with DNNAs ability to model nuanced relationships. Together, they provide a pathway to optimize appointment adherence and enhance equitable care delivery in community health and PM&R settings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 93%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 92%
- A proposed de-identification framework for a cohort of children presenting at a health facility in Uganda 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 93%
- Simulated Misuse of Large Language Models and Clinical Credit Systems 93%
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation Care Following Stroke: A Scoping Review 88%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 87%
- Fall Injury Avoidance Strategy Scale (FIAS): Development and Validation of a Scale to Quantify Fall-Related Protective Movements 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 94%
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 differ by age: a retrospective study of hospitalized adults 93%
- Scalable Incident Detection via Natural Language Processing and Probabilistic Language Models 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.