Who would take part in a pandemic preparedness cohort study? The role of vaccine-related affective polarisation: cross-sectional survey
Ipekci, A. M.; Hodel, E. M.; Filsinger, M.; Wegmuller, S.; Schuller, S.; Freitag, M.; Frahsa, A.; Wandeler, G.; Low, N.
Show abstract
IntroductionCohort studies are an important tool for public health research about emerging infectious diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in polarised opinions about important preventive measures, such as vaccination. Affective polarisation, an affinity for people with similar attitudes to oneself and hostility toward those with opposing views, is a measure of peoples feelings about these issues. The aim of this multidisciplinary study was to investigate factors associated with willingness to participate in a future household-based cohort study on pandemic preparedness. MethodsWe did a cross-sectional online survey in the Canton of Bern, Switzerland. We invited a random sample of persons aged 18+ years from 15,000 private households. We asked about willingness to take part in a future cohort study and collected data about demographic, social and household characteristics, and affective polarisation related to COVID-19 vaccination. We performed univariable and multivariable analyses, weighted by household size to estimate odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals, CI). ResultsThe survey response rate was 22.6% (n=3,394). Among responders, 49.8% (95% CI 47.9-51.8, weighted proportion) were willing to take part in a cohort study. In multivariable analysis, higher educational level (adjusted odds ratio 2.48, 95% CI 1.81-3.39) and higher monthly income (1.92, 1.39-2.65) were most strongly associated with higher willingness to participate. Opposition to COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower willingness to participate (0.53, 0.39-0.72). Affective polarisation modified the relationship between vaccination attitudes and willingness to participate. Compared with non-polarised vaccination supporters, polarised supporters were more willing to participate (marginal adjusted odds ratio 1.51, 1.05-2.16), whereas willingness to participate was lower among both non-polarised (0.53, 0.32-0.86) and affectively polarised (0.26, 0.12-0.56) vaccination opposers. ConclusionsWillingness to participate in a cohort study was low. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, addressing affective polarisation, as well as socioeconomic factors, is needed to improve participation in pandemic preparedness research. KEY MESSAGES WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC?In public health research, willingness to participate in long-term cohort studies is associated with sociodemographic factors such younger age and higher levels of education and income. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS?In an online cross-sectional survey of randomly selected households, about half of respondents were willing to take part in a future cohort study. In addition to the known sociodemographic factors, negative opinions about COVID-19 vaccination were associated with lower willingness to participate and affective polarisation, expressed as emotional affinity towards individuals with similar opinions and hostility to those with other opinions, were also associated with higher willingness to participate. HOW MIGHT THIS STUDY AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY?Willingness to participate in a long-term cohort study about pandemic preparedness was low. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, a multidisciplinary approach addressing affective polarisation, as well as socioeconomic factors, is needed to improve participation in pandemic preparedness research.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of social media platforms by migrant and ethnic minority populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review 94%
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 94%
- Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada – April 2020 to March 2021 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: A longitudinal household cross-sectional study 96%
- Socio-demographic characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Switzerland: longitudinal analysis of the CoMix study 95%
- Intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine: Results from a population-based survey in Canada 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parental preferences for a mandatory vaccination scheme in England; a discrete choice experiment 95%
- Predictors of uncertainty and unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine: an observational study of 22,139 fully vaccinated adults in the UK 95%
- Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in United Kingdom healthcare workers: Results from the UK-REACH prospective nationwide cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors indicating intention to vaccinate with a COVID-19 vaccine among older U.S. Adults 94%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal and associated factors in an adult population in Saskatchewan, Canada: Evidence from predictive modelling 94%
- Social inequalities in hostility toward vaccination against Covid-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- When do persuasive messages on vaccine safety steer COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and recommendations? Behavioral insights from a randomised controlled experiment in Malaysia 93%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 92%
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.