Back

A Cross-Species Generative Cell Atlas Across 1.5 Billion Years of Evolution: The TranscriptFormer Single-cell Model

Pearce, J. D.; Simmonds, S. E.; Mahmoudabadi, G.; Krishnan, L.; Palla, G.; Istrate, A.-M.; Tarashansky, A.; Nelson, B.; Valenzuela, O.; Li, D.; Quake, S. R.; Karaletsos, T.

2025-10-11 systems biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.04.25.650731 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell transcriptomics has revolutionized our understanding of cellular diversity, yet our understanding of the transcriptional programs across the tree of life remains limited. Here we present TranscriptFormer, a family of generative foundation models trained on up to 112 million cells spanning 1.53 billion years of evolution across 12 species. By jointly modeling gene identities and expression levels using a novel generative architecture, TranscriptFormer encodes multi-scale biological structure, functioning as a queryable virtual cell atlas. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution cell type classification, with robust performance even for species separated by over 685 million years of evolution. TranscriptFormer can also perform zero-shot disease state identification in human cells and accurately transfers cell state annotations across species boundaries. As a generative model, TranscriptFormer can be prompted to predict cell type-specific transcription factors and gene-gene interactions that align with independent experimental observations. Developmental trajectories, phylogenetic relationships and cellular hierarchies emerge naturally in TranscriptFormers representations without any explicit training on these annotations. This work establishes a powerful framework for quantitative single-cell analysis, and comparative cellular biology, thus demonstrating that universal principles of cellular organization can be learned and predicted across the tree of life.

Published in Science (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.