Back

Performance of a Modular Robotic Cluster Matches Skilled Human Operators for Complex Cell Therapy Manufacturing Tasks

Sadhu, S.; Schmittlein, B.; Lares, A.; Cheng, C.; Chen, X.; Bhatia, V.; Zha, W.; Wha, S.; Nayak, S.; Uboldi, M.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Bhanap, P. P.; Ji, Y.; Scheffler, A.; Wilson, J.; Welch, D.; Gkitsas-Long, N.; Retherford, A. J.; Tunuguntla, R.; Melocchi, A.; Girard, A.; Parietti, F.; Feldman, S. A.; Esensten, J. H.

2025-12-04 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.04.25.650551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although numerous cell and gene therapies have received regulatory approval, their adoption has been hampered by high cost and challenges in scaling out manufacturing. Many autologous cell therapies are individually manufactured for each patient using traditional manual methods in high-cost environments. Therefore, robotics and automation offer a potential solution to meet the growing demand for such therapies. To ensure identical biological outcomes, automation must replicate validated manual workflows, a requirement that poses significant engineering challenges, especially for aseptic manipulation and compatibility with manual-centric instruments and consumables. Here we describe the design and performance of a modular robotic cluster consisting of specialized modules containing widely adopted equipment. The robotic arm uses custom end-effectors to handle standard consumables and instruments such as syringes, vials, bags, cell counters, bioreactors, incubators, and closed centrifuges. We compared the performance of skilled human operators against the robotic cluster across multiple tasks: transferring cells between sterile bags, cell counting, drawing volume from a vial to a syringe, and resuspension and sampling from both a bag and G-Rex 100M-CS bioreactor. The robotic system also executed high-complexity operations with industry-standard instruments: cell selection using a CytoSinct 1000 and wash/buffer exchange with a CTS Rotea Counterflow centrifugation system. Experimental results for each unit operation show that the robotic clusters performance is equivalent to manual operations on the selected key metrics. These data demonstrate that the robotic system can efficiently and robustly perform specific unit operations, which can be combined in any order for end-to-end cell therapy manufacturing processes. One Sentence summaryA modular robotic system can perform key unit operations in cell therapy manufacturing with accuracy comparable to human operators while ensuring throughput and flexibility.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
4
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
10
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
13
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.2%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
20
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
27
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%