Back

Effects of dyad motor practice on proprioceptive function

Winter, L. V.; Sertic, J. V.; Konczak, J.

2025-04-28 neurology
10.1101/2025.04.25.25326388 medRxiv
Show abstract

Dyad practice of complex motor skills, characterized by two learners alternating between physical and observational practice, can yield better motor outcomes and reduce practice time compared to physical practice alone. It is unknown if the superior effects of dyad practice on motor learning extend to proprioceptive learning. Forty-two healthy participants (18-35 years) were randomized into three groups (n=14 each): Dyad practice, physical practice with rest (PP-rest), and physical practice without rest (PP-no rest). Participants practiced a 2 degree-of-freedom gamified wrist movement task for 20 minutes using a custom-made wrist robotic device. Wrist position sense acuity was assessed before (baseline) and 24 hours after the end of training (retention), using the Just-noticeable-difference (JND) threshold and Uncertainty. Only the PP-no rest group exhibited significantly lower JND thresholds at retention compared to baseline (t(13)=2.44; p= 0.03, Hedges g=0.70). There were no differences in position sense Uncertainty within or between groups. Dyad practice may yield superior gains in motor performance, but this did not translate into comparable gains in proprioceptive acuity. A possible explanation for these findings is that the recruitment of explicit motor learning mechanisms during dyad motor skill practice does not enhance the implicit learning mechanisms underlying proprioceptive learning. HighlightsO_LIDyad practice (DP) may yield superior motor gains compared to physical practice C_LIO_LIDP does not yield superior proprioceptive gains compared to physical practice C_LIO_LIIntensive physical practice yields the largest gains in position sense acuity C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
8
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
17
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%