A re-evaluation of Muller's sheltering hypothesis for the evolution of sex chromosome gene content
Mrnjavac, A.; Vicoso, B.; Connallon, T.
Show abstract
The first influential hypothesis for sex chromosome evolution was proposed in 1914 by H. J. Muller, who argued that once recombination was suppressed between the X and Y chromosomes, Y-linked genes become "sheltered" from selection, leading to accumulation of recessive loss-of-function (LOF) mutations and decay of Y-linked genes. The hypothesis fell out of favour in the 1970s because early mathematical models failed to support it and data on the dominance of lethal mutations were viewed as incompatible with the hypothesis. We reevaluate the main arguments against Mullers hypothesis and find that they do not conclusively exclude a role for sheltering in sex chromosome evolution. By relaxing restrictive assumptions of earlier models, we show that sheltering promotes fixation of LOF mutations with sexually dimorphic fitness effects, resulting in decay of X-linked genes that are exclusively expressed by males and Y-linked genes that are primarily, though not necessarily exclusively, expressed by females. We further show that drift and other processes contributing to Y degeneration (i.e., selective interference and regulatory evolution) expand conditions of Y-linked gene loss by sheltering. The actual contribution of sheltering to sex chromosome evolution hinges upon the distribution of dominance and sex-specific fitness effects of LOF mutations, which we discuss.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The rates of introgression and barriers to genetic exchange between hybridizing species: sex chromosomes vs. autosomes 98%
- Polygenic adaptation to an environmental shift: temporal dynamics of variation under Gaussian stabilizing selection and additive effects on a single trait 97%
- The impact of genetic modifiers on variation in germline mutation rates within and among human populations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Interactions between natural selection and recombination shape the genomic landscape of introgression 96%
- Not quite lost in translation: Mistranslation alters adaptive landscape topography and the dynamics of evolution 95%
- How the Structure of Signaling Regulation Evolves: Insights from an Evolutionary Model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.