Back

Harnessing machine learning to predict antibiotic susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

Vergauwe, F.; De Waele, G.; Sass, A.; Highmore, C.; Hanrahan, N.; Cook, Y.; Lichtenberg, M.; Cnockaert, M.; Vandamme, P.; Mahajan, S.; Webb, J.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; Bjarnsholt, T.; Waegeman, W.; Coenye, T.

2025-04-24 microbiology
10.1101/2025.04.24.650389 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Standard antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) often fail to accurately predict treatment outcomes because they do not account for biofilm-specific mechanisms of reduced susceptibility. In the present study, we explored alternative approaches to predict tobramycin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms that were experimentally evolved in physiologically relevant conditions. To this end, we used four analytical methods - whole-genome sequencing (WGS), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) and multi-excitation Raman spectroscopy (MX-Raman). Machine learning models were trained on data outputs from these methods to predict tobramycin susceptibility of our evolved strains and subsequently validated with a collection of clinical isolates. For minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) predictions of the evolved strains, the highest accuracy{+/-}1 was achieved with MALDI-TOF MS (97.83 %), while for biofilm prevention concentration (BPC) predictions, Raman spectroscopy performed best with an accuracy{+/-}1 of 80.43 %. Overall, all analytical methods demonstrated comparable predictive performance, showing their potential for improving biofilm AST.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.