Back

Close-Up of vesicular ER Exit Sites by Volume Electron Imaging using FIB-SEM

Nair, A.; Nair, A.; Stock, P.; Jain, A.; Somerville, E.; Sanyal, A.; Kirchhausen, T.

2025-04-24 cell biology
10.1101/2025.04.23.650353 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Volume electron microscopy by high-pressure freeze substitution combined with block-face focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) provides comprehensive 3D views of subcellular architecture, essential for understanding cellular activity in context. Aided by Automated Segmentation in Electron Microscopy (ASEM)--a 3D-Unet convolutional neural network trained with sparse annotations--we characterized the spatial organization of endoplasmic reticulum exit sites (ERES), the initial locations for membrane remodeling in protein secretion, in cells not overexpressing secretory cargo. The ASEM model, trained on 50-70 nm in diameter COPI vesicles, successfully identified vesicles adjacent to the Golgi apparatus of HeLa, SVG-A, and iPSC-derived neurons. It also revealed abundant vesicles of similar appearance, often within a group of [~]5-40 vesicles clustered within a 250 nm3 region adjacent to flattened endoplasmic reticulum (ER) domains, forming what we propose are COPII-mediated vesicular ER-exit sites. Elsewhere, similar assemblies appeared alongside tubular ER networks emerging from similarly enlarged ER domains previously reported as the only ERES in HeLa cells. These findings underscore the power of large-scale volume electron microscopy to resolve contradictions regarding membrane organization in vesicular trafficking. We encourage the scientific community to use our publicly accessible repository, containing open-source code, trained models, annotations, predictions, and FIB- SEM datasets, to facilitate continued advances in automated segmentation methods. SummaryNair et. al. show abundance of vesicular ERES in mammalian cells imaged by volume focused ion beam electron microscopy.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.