Back

Imaging traumatic brain injuries in mice with potassium channel PET tracer 3F4AP

Ramos-Torres, K. M.; Takahashi, K.; Radomski, K. L.; Mandeville, E. T.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.-P.; Lo, E. H.; Armstrong, R. C.; Brugarolas, P.

2025-04-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.23.650093 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTraumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to secondary injury, including axon and myelin damage, which contributes to long-term neurological deficits. The PET tracer [18F]3F4AP, a fluorinated derivative of the FDA-approved drug 4-aminopyridine, selectively binds to voltage-gated potassium (KV) channels, offering a novel approach to assess TBI-related node of Ranvier disruption and demyelination. This study evaluates [18F]3F4AP PET in penetrating and non-penetrating TBI models. MethodsEither controlled cortical impact (CCI, penetrating) or concussive (non-penetrating) TBI models were used to induce TBI in mice. Dynamic PET imaging with [18F]3F4AP was performed at time points of 0, 3, 7, 14, and/or 31 days post-injury (dpi), with quantitative analyses comparing tracer uptake in injured versus control regions. Luxol fast blue (LFB) staining was conducted to evaluate histological myelin loss. ResultsIn the CCI model, [18F]3F4AP PET imaging demonstrated a 34% increase in tracer uptake at the injury site at 7 dpi, correlating with histological evidence of demyelination. Tracer uptake gradually declined over time, reflecting potential remyelination. The concussive TBI model showed a smaller and more diffuse increase in uptake at 7 dpi compared to CCI. Conclusion[18F]3F4AP PET imaging effectively detects demyelination following TBI, with very high sensitivity in penetrating injuries. These findings highlight the potential of [18F]3F4AP as a valuable imaging biomarker for assessing TBI progression and/or therapeutic response. Further studies are warranted to explore its clinical applicability and comparison with other imaging modalities.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.