Back

The effect of different milk pretreatment methods on microbiome community development during Herrgards cheese production and ripening.

Rodriguez, J. A.; Santos-Bay, L.; Narechania, A.; Caroe, C.; Siren, K.; Mak, S. S. T.; Broman Nielsen, I.; Ramsoe, M.; Ponten, T. S.; Lillevang, S.; Tranberg Andersen, L.; Gilbert, M. T. P.

2025-04-23 microbiology
10.1101/2025.04.23.648337 bioRxiv
Show abstract

One of the biggest challenges for dairy producers is the substantial variability in final product properties caused by changes in the production environment. In cheese production, this variation is influenced by several factors, particularly the milk base and its pretreatment, which shape the microbiome throughout the process and ultimately affect the cheeses organoleptic characteristics. To examine the impact of three different pre-treatments for pasteurised milk-- microfiltration, protein fortification, and only pasteurisation (control)-- on microbiome dynamics, we generated metagenome sequencing data from 14 cheese production steps across these three production trials at a Danish dairy factory. We constructed three metagenomic co-assemblies, identifying nine high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Our analysis revealed that a specific strain of Lactococcus lactis dominates the process, while other minor bacterial species persist at very low abundances (<1%), contributing non-negligibly to product properties. Notably, Clostridium tyrobutyricum, a known dairy spoilage bacterium, was present at low levels in pasteurised-only and protein-fortified milk trials but was nearly absent in microfiltered milk. To enhance our analyses, we implemented KHILL, a novel k-mer-based method applied directly to raw sequencing reads, which facilitates metagenomic co-assembly and enables early detection of unwanted microorganisms. Our findings provide industrial dairy producers with a comprehensive view of microbial dynamics during cheese production, offering insights to improve process consistency and product quality.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
4
Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
6
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
9
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
17
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
21
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%
24
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
28
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%