Context, Delivery Models, and Healthcare Outcomes of Community-Oriented Primary Care Services in Cuba: A Systematic Review of Narrative Evidence Protocol
Wang, Y.; Chen, N.; Wei, Y.; Yu, D.; Xu, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to summarize narratives related to the context, delivery models, and healthcare outcomes associated with Community-Oriented Primary Care (COPC) services provided by Cuban primary care practitioners to local community residents. Introduction"Community orientation" is a core feature of primary health care that enhances population health and a vital skill for general practitioners. COPC integrates primary health care and community medicine in a coordinated practice to improve population health. Cuba stands out globally, particularly among low- and middle-income countries, for its primary health care system and has achieved outstanding population health outcomes through this approach. However, systematic evidence summarizing the context, delivery models, and healthcare outcomes of COPC in Cuba remains lacking. Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaIncluded documents must: (1) focus on Cuban primary care practitioners and teams delivering community-oriented primary care services, along with local residents receiving and participating in these services; (2) explicitly address COPC services, including their context, delivery models, and healthcare outcomes; (3) be set in the Cuban community or primary care context; (4) consist of published or unpublished narratives within grey literature; (5) be in Spanish or English; and (6) be published on or after January 1, 1990. Excluded literature: (1) does not explicitly mention COPC services provided by Cuban practitioners, their context, or healthcare outcomes; (2) only addresses context beyond local health administration and community influence (e.g., U.S. economic embargo); (3) only involves events outside the Cuban primary care context (e.g., international medical missions); (4) is not a narrative (e.g., quantitative or qualitative studies). MethodsWe will search narrative literature published between January 1, 1990, and July 31, 2024, in Spanish or English across four academic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase, and grey literature from the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA), including its Latin American branches, and the Cuban Ministry of Public Health websites. The review protocol is developed using JBI SUMARI. Qualified researchers will screen literature using Rayyan and JBI SUMARI, assess methodological quality, and extract data with JBI SUMARI tools. Data will be synthesized via the meta-aggregation method in JBI SUMARI. Systematic Review Registration NumberThis study is registered with PROSPERO, registration number is: CRD420251018485.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 95%
- Evidence of integrated health service delivery during COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 91%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 94%
- Implementing essential diagnostics-learning from essential medicines: A scoping review 93%
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 92%
- Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.