Back

A Global Perspective on Determinants of Cardiovascular Mortality: Linear Regression Model of 183 Countries on Nationwide Cardiovascular Policies, Socioeconomic Disparities, Universal Health Coverage and Tobacco

Megantara, H. P.; Dakota, I.; Indriani, S.; Aurora, R. G.; Taofan, T.; Adiarto, S.

2025-04-25 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.04.23.25326323
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular (CV) diseases remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Various determinants has been indicated contributing in CV mortality, spanning from health policy, universal health coverage (UHC), tobacco and socioeconomic diversity. To date, no quantitative regression model has been established to exhibit the magnitude and prediction of CV mortality. We aimed to formulate a linear regression model of CV determinants involving healthcare insurance coverage and national policy, economic status, smoking prevalence, gender and subregional variety. MethodsA linear regression model was employed, with the percentage of cardiovascular deaths as the dependent variable. Independent variables were Universal Health Coverage (UHC), World Bank income classifications, availability of national policy on CV, gender, availability of national CV guideline, CV risk stratification in primary healthcare, smoking and sub-regions. Data were gathered from World Health Organization and The World Bank dataset. ResultsA total of 2,385 data points from 2015 to 2019 was acquired constituting 183 countries. More extensive UHC ({beta} = -0.052, t = -3.663, p <0.001) and high-income countries (-0.060, t = -2.756, p <0.001) exhibited lower predicted CV mortality. Smoking prevalence was strongly correlated with higher mortality ({beta} = 0.128, t = 8.408, p <0.001). Regional disparities were observed, with Eastern Europe presenting highest mortality rate ({beta} = 0.685, t = 32.686, p <0.001). Compared to male, female showed higher cardiovascular death ({beta} = 0.047, t = 4.017, p <0.001). The availability of national policies in cardiovascular health were associated with lower mortality ({beta} = -0.031, t = -3.211, p = 0.001). CV national guideline was the only non-significant CV determinant. ConclusionsThe development of a quantitative regression model for cardiovascular mortality incorporating multifaceted determinants was expected to promote comprehensive public health strategies, policy reforms, and national health system strengthening, which are essential to reduce the global burden of cardiovascular diseases. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=169 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25326323v1_fig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14ebbf5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15e1e1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a0b130org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d0e87c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 1C_FLOATNO (Graphical Abstract). Summary of the research and quantified determinants of CV death. UHC: universal health coverage, CV: cardiovascular, *[&ge;]50% availability of CV risk stratification program in primary health care. C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 34%
13.9%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 7%
13.5%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
5.7%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 5%
5.0%
5
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 6%
3.0%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 7%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 4%
2.7%
11
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 7%
2.5%
13
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
14
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 70%
1.7%
15
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 15%
1.7%
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
18
SSM - Population Health
based on 17 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
19
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 9%
1.4%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 12%
1.3%
21
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
22
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
26
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
27
JAMA
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
EClinicalMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%