Impact of self-administered pulse oximetry among non-hospitalized patients at risk of severe COVID-19 in Honduras: A pragmatic, block-randomized trial
Roberts, K. W.; Alvarez, B.; de St. Aubin, M.; Diaz, O.; Garnier, S.; Schnorr, C. D.; Cruz, S.; Pavon, L.; Ochoa, A.; Medice, S.; Santos, H. M.; Ochoa, J.; Solis, S.; Dumas, D.; Baldwin, M.; Martinez, A.; Nilles, E.
Show abstract
The World Health Organization recommends remote monitoring and self-administered pulse oximetry to identify silent hypoxia and the need for medical intervention in non-hospitalized high-risk COVID-19 patients. These interventions have been evaluated previously, but evidence is needed to determine the impact on morbidity and mortality, particularly in lower- and middle-income countries. MethodsA prospective, pragmatic, open-label trial was conducted in Tegucigalpa and Comayaguela, Honduras to evaluate the impact of self-administered pulse oximetry to reduce morbidity and mortality among non-hospitalized patients at high risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes enrolled in a remote monitoring program. Participants were block-randomized to remote monitoring plus self-administered pulse oximetry versus remote monitoring alone. Participants in the pulse oximetry arm received daily calls to assess for high-risk clinical features, including hypoxia (oxygen saturation: SpO2 [≤]94%) All participants reporting high risk symptoms were referred for in-person evaluation. The clinical trial is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04886414. FindingsBetween March 30, 2022 and January 24, 2023, 1,821 participants met the intention to treat analysis criteria, of whom 925 were randomized to remote monitoring and 897 to remote monitoring with pulse oximetry. Nearly ninety-nine percent of participants reported receiving one or more COVID-19 vaccine doses, and 90.2% three or more doses, with similar coverage across arms. Participants in the pulse oximetry arm were more likely to be referred for clinical evaluation (OR 1.60 [95% CI 1.09 - 2.46], p = 0.018), but not more likely to be hospitalized (OR 1.55 [95% CI 0.55 - 4.37, p = 0.401]. One participant died, two required intensive care, and none required mechanical ventilation; given limited data, these outcomes were not assessed. InterpretationFindings suggest that the use of self-administered pulse oximetry increased referral for additional care but did not result in different rates of hospitalization among a high-risk, but highly vaccinated, population with low rates of severe COVID-19. Given the infrequent progression to severe COVID-19, this trial did not assess whether self-administered pulse oximetry is related to mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or admission to intensive care. FundingThe U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the trial and supported design, interpretation, and review. All decisions were taken by the primary investigator. Rapid antigen tests were donated by Roche Diagnostics, Ltd, which had no additional involvement.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 94%
- Hydroxychloroquine For The Treatment Of Severe Respiratory Infection By COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 94%
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 94%
- The angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist C21 restores respiratory function in COVID19 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial 93%
- Early treatment with nitazoxanide prevents worsening of mild and moderate COVID-19 and subsequent hospitalization 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Collecting mortality data via mobile phone surveys: a non-inferiority randomized trial in Malawi 93%
- Hypoxaemia prevalence and management among children and adults presenting to primary care facilities in Uganda: a prospective cohort study 92%
- Definitions matter: heterogeneity of COVID-19 disease severity criteria and incomplete reporting compromise meta-analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.