Evaluating Migraine Trigger Surprisal: Associations with Migraine Activity
Turner, D. P.; Patel, T.; Caplis, E.; Houle, T. T.
Show abstract
BackgroundIdentifying migraine triggers is a common goal for most individuals with migraine but remains challenging due to the vast number of possible trigger candidates and their fluctuating nature. The unexpectedness of daily experiences, quantified through information-theoretic surprisal, may integrate many sources of variation and predict future migraine attacks. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the association between surprisal and future headache attacks. MethodsIn this prospective daily diary study, N = 109 individuals with migraine were enrolled, with N = 104 completing twice-daily electronic entries for up to 28 days, yielding 5,176 total diaries. Diary items captured exposure to potential migraine triggers across behavioral, emotional, and environmental domains. For each entry, total surprisal scores were calculated using within-person empirical probability distributions to reflect how atypical each days experiences were. ResultsParticipants experienced a headache on 1,518/5,145 (29.5%) of days with complete diary information. Higher surprisal significantly predicted increased migraine risk within 12 hours (OR = 1.86 [95%CI: 1.12-3.08], p = 0.016) and 24 hours (OR = 2.15 [95%CI: 1.44-3.20], p < 0.001), with stronger effects observed at the longer interval. Notably, the association between current surprisal and migraine onset was moderated by recent surprisal history and exhibited nonlinear properties at 12 hours. Random effects revealed substantial between-person variability in surprisal sensitivity, and individuals with higher baseline headache risk showed attenuated associations. ConclusionsSurprisal offers a novel, individualized measure of trigger unpredictability that is associated with short-term migraine risk. Incorporating surprisal into digital tools may improve personalized prediction and prevention strategies, moving beyond static trigger lists to a dynamic, context-aware model of migraine self-management.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An interdisciplinary outpatient therapy program for children and adolescents with headache - real world data 94%
- Major sex differences in migraine prevalence among occupational categories: a cross-sectional study using UK Biobank 93%
- Differential fMRI neural synchrony associated with migraine during naturalistic stimuli with negative emotional valence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographically Differential Patterns of Chronic Pain Progression Revealed by Analyzing the All of Us Research Program Data 92%
- Detecting QT prolongation From a Single-lead ECG With Deep Learning 85%
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective sleep quality and objective sleep physiology in migraineurs: a meta-analysis 93%
- Enhanced reflexive eye closure is mediated by ipRGC signals and is specific to migraine with visual aura 92%
- Next-Day Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Levels to Aid Diagnosis of Sport-Related Concussion 87%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Migraine Disability, Pain Catastrophizing, And Headache Severity Are Associated With Evoked Pain And Targeted By Mind-Body Therapy 94%
- Enhanced mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR+) in episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trial with MRI outcomes 94%
- Effects Of Mindfulness On Sleep Quality, Anxiety, Depression and Stress In Migraine 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.