Back

AOP-helpFinder 3.0: from text mining to network visualization of key event relationships, and knowledge integration from multi-sources.

Jaylet, T.; Jornod, F.; Capdet, Q.; Armant, O.; Audouze, K.

2025-04-23 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.04.22.648318 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationThe Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOP) framework advances alternative toxicology by prioritizing the mechanisms underlying toxic effects. It organizes existing knowledge in a structured way, tracing the progression from the initial perturbation of a molecular event--caused by various stressors--through key events (KEs) across different biological levels, ultimately leading to adverse outcomes that affect human health and ecosystems. However, the increasing volume of toxicological data presents a significant challenge for integrating all available knowledge effectively. ResultsArtificial intelligence provides powerful methods to analyze and integrate large, heterogeneous data sources. Within this framework, the AOP-helpFinder text mining tool, accessible as a web server, was designed to identify stressor-event and event-event relationships by automatically screening scientific literature in the PubMed database, facilitating the development of AOPs. The proposed new version introduces enhanced functionality by incorporating additional data sources, automatically annotating events from the literature with toxicological database information in a systems biology context. Users can now visualize results as interactive networks directly on the web server. With these advancements, AOP-helpFinder 3.0 offers a robust solution for integrative and predictive toxicology, as demonstrated in a case study exploring toxicological mechanisms associated with radon exposure. AvailabilityAOP-helpFinder is available at https://aop-helpfinder-v3.u-paris-sciences.fr/ Contactkarine.audouze@u-paris.fr Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available on Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/15193936) and codes on GitHub (https://github.com/systox1124/AOP-helpFinder).

Published in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Bioinformatics · published here
1204 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
27.5%
2
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.7%
4
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
5
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
9
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
12
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Chemosphere
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Hazardous Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
24
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
27
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%