Population-weighted Image-on-scalar Regression Analyses of Large Scale Neuroimaging Data
Lin, Z.; Molloy, M. F.; Sripada, C.; Kang, J.; Si, Y.
Show abstract
Recent advances in neuroimaging modeling highlight the importance of accounting for subgroup heterogeneity in population-based neuroscience research through various investigations in large scale neuroimaging data collection. To integrate survey methodology with neuroscience research, we present an imaging data analysis aiming to achieve population generalizability with screened subsets of data. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study has enrolled a large cohort of participants to reflect the individual variation of the U.S. population in adolescent development. To ensure population representation, the ABCD Study has released the base weights. We estimated the associations between brain activities and cognitive performance using the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data from the ABCD Studys n-back working memory task. Notably, the imaging subsample exhibits differences from the baseline cohort in key child characteristics, and such discrepancies cannot be addressed simply by applying the ABCD base weights. We developed new population weights specific to the subsample and included the adjusted weights in the image-on-scalar regression model. We validated the approach through synthetic simulations and applications to fMRI data from the ABCD Study. Our findings indicate that population weighting adjustments influence association estimates between brain activities and cognition, emphasizing the importance of evaluating validity and generalizability in population neuroscience research.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fighting or Embracing Multiplicity in Neuroimaging? Neighborhood Leverage versus Global Calibration 97%
- Relationship Between Prediction Accuracy and Feature Importance Reliability: an Empirical and Theoretical Study 96%
- Selective peak inference: Unbiased estimation of raw and standardized effect size at local maxima 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Missing data approaches for longitudinal neuroimaging research: Examples from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study 94%
- Using synthetic MR images for field map-less distortion correction 92%
- A general exposome factor explains individual differences in functional brain network topography and cognition in youth 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance Scaling for Structural MRI Surface Parcellations: A Machine Learning Analysis in the ABCD Study 94%
- Towards Assessing Subcortical “Deep Brain” Biomarkers of PTSD with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy 94%
- Quantifying the contribution of subject and group factors in brain activation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.