Back

A Novel FiO2 Titration Protocol for Quantifying Pulmonary Oxygen Reserve Capacity : Dynamic Assessment Framework for Infection-Associated Respiratory Dysfunction

Shi, Q.

2025-04-25 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.04.21.25326055 medRxiv
Show abstract

2BackgroundProgressive decline in pulmonary oxygen reserve capacity (ORC) is a hallmark of infection-associated respiratory dysfunction. Current tools (PaO2/FiO2 ratio, cardiopulmonary exercise testing [CPET], computed tomography [CT]) are limited in dynamic monitoring due to delayed responsiveness, operational complexity, or radiation risks, and other constraints. MethodsThe ORC testing methodology integrates the dynamic load-incrementation logic of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with the oxygenation quantification framework of PaO2/FiO2. Its operational paradigm comprises three phases: {sscircled1}Testing Protocol Conducted under ventilation-locked conditions, a stepwise FiO2 titration protocol is applied, with termination triggered when SpO2 {sscircled2}Parameter Definition The minimum FiO2 required to maintain SpO2 [≥]90% (FiO2-MIN) is recorded, and the oxygen reserve capacity is calculated as ORC = 0.21 - FiO2-MIN. {sscircled3}Dynamic Modeling Through continuous monitoring throughout the entire disease course, ORC time-series data are acquired. A time-ORC curve is then fitted, and based on differential calculus ({beta} = {Delta}ORC/{Delta}t, {gamma} = {Delta}{beta}/{Delta}t), they collectively establish a quantitative respiratory compensation dynamics model in conjunction with the time-ORC curve. ResultsThe ORC test provides a novel non-invasive tool for dynamic quantification of respiratory reserve. Early warning of ARDS transformation during acute infection and quantitative dynamic tracking of lung dysfunction of long-COVID syndrome are its potential application scenarios. Its clinical utility requires prospective validation through multicenter trials integrated with CPET and CT quantitative analysis.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.