Back

TDP-43 toxic gain of function links ALS/FTLD-TDP and Alzheimer's Disease through splicing

Van Zuiden, W.; Meimoun, T. D.; Bar, C.; Siany, A.; Moshe, L.; Yacovzada, N. S.; Weizman, E.; Neumann, M.; Buchman, A. S.; Wang, Y.; Bennett, D. A.; Glass, J. D. G. D.; Trautwig, A. N.; Seyfried, N.; Cooper-Knock, J.; Hornstein, E.

2025-04-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.20.648873 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Loss of nuclear TDP-43 splicing activity is a common feature across neurodegenerative diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), but its relevance to Alzheimers disease (AD) remains unclear. Here, we show that TDP-43 pathology in AD is broadly associated with splicing abnormalities, including aberrant splicing of amyloid precursor protein (APP). TDP-43 drives the formation of elongated APP isoforms, disrupting alternative splicing across ALS, FTLD-TDP and AD, providing a compelling mechanism for a long-standing observation of APP isoform dysregulation. We further establish a mechanistic link between TDP-43, APP splicing, and A{beta} pathology. Surprisingly, the disruption to alternative APP splicing is mediated by a toxic gain of cytoplasmic TDP-43 function, rather than loss of its nuclear role. Using proximity proteomics and base editing in human iPSC-derived neurons, we show that TDP-43 pathology causes cytoplasmic co-sequestration of splicing regulators SCAF11, SRSF5, and TIAL1. Knockdown of these regulators also results in APP mis-splicing and increased A{beta} burden, without affecting other TDP-43 targets such as STMN2 or UNC13A. Together, our findings suggest that TDP-43-mediated splicing dysfunction upstream of APP contributes to the pathogenesis of seemingly disparate neurodegenerative diseases, uniting AD and ALS/FTLD-TDP through a shared molecular mechanism.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.