Are all waterholes equal from a lion's view? Exploring the role of prey abundance and catchability in waterhole visitation patterns in a savannah ecosystem
Dejeante, R.; Loveridge, A. J.; Macdonald, D. W.; Madhlamoto, D.; Chamaille-Jammes, S.; Valeix, M.
Show abstract
Prey abundance and catchability shape the spatial ecology of predators. Predators can select habitats where prey are more abundant to maximize encounter rate with prey or habitats where prey are more catchable to maximize prey capture. These hypotheses are commonly referred to as prey-abundance and prey-catchability hypotheses. Although these hypotheses are often tested at the landscape scale, little is known about how between-patch variations in prey abundance and catchability determine the space use of predators. In many savannah ecosystems, large herbivores aggregate around waterholes, which become hotspots of prey and their selection by predators is classically interpreted as supporting the prey-abundance hypothesis. Here, we investigated whether between-waterhole variations in prey abundance and catchability influence the frequency and duration of lion visits to waterholes, testing the prey-abundance and prey-catchability hypotheses at the resource-patch scale. We combined datasets on (1) lion movements recorded from GPS collars deployed on 20 adult males and 16 adult females between 2002 and 2015, (2) prey abundance evaluated from long-term, regular monitoring of waterholes and (3) prey catchability evaluated from remote-sensing satellite imagery of vegetation cover around waterholes in Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe). Lions did not equally use all waterholes in their territory: there was a high variability in the frequency and duration of visits. Surprisingly, between-waterhole variations in prey abundance and catchability only slightly explained these variations in frequency - and even less in duration - of lion visits to waterholes. Yet, the frequency of lion visits to waterholes decreased with the number of waterholes within their territory, and male lions more frequently visited the waterholes surrounded by more open habitats. We discuss the limits of our work, but also the ecological mechanisms that may explain these findings. First, lions and their prey are involved in a 'shell-game' that leads them to adopt unpredictable movement strategies. Second, lions have only access to a limited number of waterholes to spread out their hunting effort. Lastly, lions visit waterholes not only to hunt but also to interact with social mates and competitors. This work challenges the implicit assumption that all waterholes are the same from a lion's view and calls for further studies investigating the drivers of the variability in lion visits at the resource-patch scale.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Territoriality and resource availability modulate the effect of conspecific encounters on the foraging behaviours of a mammalian predator 96%
- A seasonal pulse of ungulate neonates influences space use by carnivores in a multi-predator, multi-prey system 96%
- Fine-scale coexistence between Mediterranean mesocarnivores is mediated by spatial, temporal and trophic resource partitioning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Movement-integrated habitat selection reveals wolves balance ease of travel with human avoidance in a risk-reward trade-off 96%
- Evaluating diversionary feeding as a method to resolve conservation conflicts in a recovering ecosystem. 95%
- Using animal tracking for early detection of mass poisoning events 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Terrain ruggedness and human activities influence the distribution of Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Tayna Nature Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo 95%
- Anthropogenic supply of nutrients in a wildlife reserve may compromise conservation success 95%
- Nomadic ungulate movements under threat: Declining mobility of Mongolian gazelles in the Eastern Steppe. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.