Translation Accuracy in E. coli
Stikeleather, R.; Ali, F.; Ho, W.-C.; Licknack, T.; Lynch, M.
Show abstract
We present a method that quantifies nearly all pairwise amino acid substitutions, revealing the rates and spectra of mistranslation per amino acid and per codon. While determining error rates is illuminating, understanding why certain mistranslation events are enriched requires further exploration, particularly in relation to the translation-accuracy hypothesis. We found that codons favored in highly expressed genes are not predictive of translational fidelity and are not selected for translational accuracy. We evaluated our method using historically characterized ribosomal variants of Escherichia coli reported to differ in translation fidelity. However, we found no significant differences among their overall translation-error rates, estimated here to be [~]2 per 1,000 amino acids. Instead they each exhibited unique mistranslation profiles, which likely led to prior overestimates of the translation error-rate in the putative error-prone variant. Together, these results underscore the significance of a direct, proteome-wide measure of translation fidelity.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Common evolutionary origins of the bacterial glycyl tRNA synthetase and alanyl tRNA synthetase 93%
- The amino acid sequence determines protein abundance through its conformational stability and reduced synthesis cost. 93%
- The importance of input sequence set to consensus-derived proteins and their relationship to reconstructed ancestral proteins 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.