Back

Identifiability of Phylogenetic Level-2 Networks under the Jukes-Cantor Model

Englander, A. K.; Frohn, M.; Gross, E.; Holtgrefe, N.; van Iersel, L.; Jones, M.; Sullivant, S.

2025-04-24 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.04.18.649493 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWWe investigate which evolutionary histories can potentially be reconstructed from sufficiently long DNA sequences by studying the identifiability of phylogenetic networks from sequence data generated under site independent models of molecular evolution. While previous work in the field has established the identifiability of phylogenetic trees and level-1 networks, networks with non-overlapping reticulation cycles, less is known about more complex network structures. In this work, we extend identifiability results to network classes that include pairs of tangled reticulations. Our main result shows that binary semi-directed level-2 phylogenetic networks are generically identifiable under the Jukes-Cantor model, provided they are triangle-free and strongly tree-child. We also strengthen existing identifiability results for level-1 networks, showing that the number of reticulation nodes is generically identifiable under the Jukes-Cantor model. In addition, we present more general identifiability results that do not restrict the network level at all and hold for the Jukes-Cantor as well as for the Kimura-2-Parameter model. Specifically, we demonstrate that any two binary semi-directed networks that display different sets of 4-leaf subtrees (quartets) are distinguishable. This has direct implications for the identifiability of a networks reticulated components (blobs). We show that the tree-of-blobs of a network, the global branching structure of the network, is identifiable, as well as the circular ordering of the subnetworks around each blob, for networks in which edges do not cross and taxa are on the outside.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
3
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Theoretical Population Biology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.5%
16
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.4%
18
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%
24
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%