The 4th GPCR Dock: assessment of blind predictions for GPCR-ligand complexes in the era of AlphaFold
Chitsazi, R.; Wu, Y.; GPCR Dock 2021 participants, ; Stevens, R. C.; Zhao, S.; Kufareva, I.
Show abstract
The GPCR Dock competitions are a series of community-wide assessments of computational structural modeling and ligand docking for G protein-coupled receptors, a central class of drug targets in the human proteome. The assessments are designed to provide an unbiased overview of progress and to pinpoint areas in need of refinement, thus shaping and directing the development of computational modeling methodologies for GPCRs. In the footsteps of 2008, 2010, and 2013 assessments, the 4th round (GPCR Dock 2021) featured five diverse and challenging prediction targets and coincided with the emergence of AlphaFold, the revolutionary Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology for protein structure prediction from amino acid sequences. This report summarizes the assessment results and challenges in the context of the convergent evolution of computational and experimental structure determination techniques for GPCRs. We demonstrate that thanks to the breakthroughs in AI-powered modeling, the accuracy of modern computational models of GPCR complexes with peptides can not only approach but also exceed that of low-resolution experimental structures. However, our results highlight the unwavering need for high-resolution GPCR structure determination, especially with small molecule chemicals, and for the concurrent application of physics-based and expert-guided modeling methods.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The molecular mechanism of positive allosteric modulation at the dopamine D1 receptor 95%
- vScreenML v2.0: Improved Machine Learning Classification for Reducing False Positives in Structure-Based Virtual Screening 95%
- Comprehensive collection and prediction of ABC transmembrane protein structures in the AI era of structural biology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common patterns of hydrolysis initiation in P-loop fold nucleoside triphosphatases 94%
- Integrating Conformational Dynamics and Perturbation-Based Network Modeling for Mutational Profiling of Binding and Allostery in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variant Complexes with Antibodies: Balancing Local and Global Determinants of Mutational Escape Mechanisms 94%
- Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic and accurate ligand structure determination guided by cryo-electron microscopy maps 96%
- Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide-protein docking 94%
- Inactive structures of the vasopressin V2 receptor reveal distinct antagonist binding modes for Tolvaptan and Mambaquaretin toxin 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.