Back

Limited Echocardiogram Acquisition by Clinicians Aided with Deep Learning: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kumar, A.; Baum, E.; Parmer, C.; Kugler, J.

2025-04-20 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.04.18.25326085 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDeep learning (DL) programs can aid in the acquisition of echocardiograms by medical professionals not previously trained in sonography, potentially addressing access issues in underserved communities. This study evaluates whether DL-enabled devices improve limited echocardiogram acquisition by novice clinicians not trained on sonography. MethodsIn this single-center randomized controlled trial (2023-2024), internal medicine residents (N=38) without sonography training received a personal ultrasound device with (N=19) or without (N=19) DL capability for two weeks while caring for patients on a hospital ward. Participants were allowed to use the devices at their discretion for patient-related care. The DL software provided real-time guidance for probe placement and image quality assessment. The primary outcome was time to acquire a five-view limited echocardiogram. Measurements occurred at randomization and after two weeks, with all scans performed on the same standardized patient. Secondary outcomes included image quality using the modified Rapid Assessment for Competency in Echocardiography (RACE) scale and participant attitudes. ResultsAt baseline, both groups had comparable scan times and image quality scores. At follow-up, the DL group demonstrated significantly faster total scan times (152 seconds [IQR 115-195] vs. 266 seconds [IQR 206-324]; p<0.001; Cohens D 1.7) and better image quality with higher RACE scores (15 [IQR 10-18] vs. 11 [IQR 7-13.5]; p=0.034; Cohens D 0.84). Trust in the AI features did not differ between the groups post-intervention. ConclusionsUltrasound machines with DL features may improve image acquisition times and image quality by novices not trained in sonography. These findings suggest DL algorithms could help address critical gaps in image acquisition by healthcare professionals.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.5%
5
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
9
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
18
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
24
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
25
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%