Back

Detecting cell-level transcriptomic changes of Perturb-seq using Contrastive Fine-tuning of Single-Cell Foundation Models

Zhao, W.; Solaguren-Beascoa, A.; Neilson, G.; Reynolds, R.; Muhammed, L.; Laaniste, L.; Cakiroglu, S. A.

2025-04-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.04.17.649395 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-scale perturbation cell atlases are an exciting new resource to understand the transcriptomic and phenotypic impact of single-gene activation or knockdown. However, in terms of differentially expressed genes identified, the signal detected in these data atlases is low, leading to the exclusion of most data from downstream analyses. Recent advances in single-cell foundation models have shown promise in capturing complex biological insights. However, their application to perturbation analysis, especially in predicting perturbed single-cell transcriptomes, remains limited. In this paper, we focus on learning representations of single-cell transcriptomes that capture subtle, yet important, transcriptome-wide changes, and we propose a novel fine-tuning strategy using contrastive learning to leverage single-cell foundation models for this task. We pre-train a single-cell foundation model and fine-tune on a genome-scale perturbation dataset using a contrastive loss, which minimises the distance between cell embeddings from unperturbed cells while maximising the distance between perturbed and unperturbed cells. We validate and test the model on unseen perturbations, demonstrating its ability to identify global biologically meaningful transcriptional changes not captured by traditional differential expression methods. Our approach provides a novel framework for analysing single-cell perturbation data and offers a more effective means of identifying perturbations that drive systemic gene expression changes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.