Rare-variant aggregate association analysis using imputed data is a powerful approach.
Liu, T.; Auer, P. L.; Wang, G. T.; Naderi, E.; DeWan, A. T.; Leal, S. M.
Show abstract
Imputation can cost-effectively generate genotypes for millions of variants. The power of performing rare variant aggregate association tests using imputed genotypes was evaluated. White Europeans from the UK Biobank with exome sequence and genotype array data were analyzed. Using the genotype type array data from the UK Biobank, imputation was performed using the HRC r1.1 (N=64,976 Haplotypes) and TOPMed r3 (N=267,194 haplotypes) reference panels. Simulations were used to compare the power of performing rare variant aggregate association analysis using sequence and imputed data. Additionally, the number of genes with >2 rare variants (missense, nonsense, splice site) was approximately the same for exome sequence and TOPMed imputed data, but HRC imputed data had [~]10% fewer genes. For the imputed data, using a less stringent R2 threshold (i.e., >0.3 vs. >0.8) led to greater power to detect aggregate associations due to additional rare variants included in the test. Exome sequence data provided the highest power for rare variant aggregate association testing, with TOPMed imputed variants usually having less than a 20% reduction in power. HRC imputed variants provided substantially less power. We also performed rare variant aggregate association analyses using UK Biobank phenotype, exome sequence data, and imputed variants for PCSK9 and low-density lipoprotein (N=159,904 study subjects) and APOC3 and triglyceride levels (N=160,036 study subjects). For these analyses, even when ultra-rare variants (minor allele frequency<0.001) were analyzed, significant aggregate associations could be detected for the exome sequence data and TOPMed and HRC imputed variants. Although there is a decrease in power for rare variant aggregate association tests when analyzing imputed variants compared to sequence data due to missing variants and uncertainty in genotypes, analysis of imputed data is a viable approach to detect rare variant aggregate associations when sequence data is unavailable.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Widespread recessive effects on common diseases in a cohort of 44,000 British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis with high autozygosity 96%
- UK-Biobank Whole Exome Sequence Binary Phenome Analysis with Robust Region-based Rare Variant Test 96%
- The Phenotype-Genotype Reference Map: Improving biobank data science through replication. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inclusion of Variants Discovered from Diverse Populations Improves Polygenic Risk Score Transferability 95%
- Evaluating Genomic Polygenic Risk Scores for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Latinos 95%
- Multivariate adaptive shrinkage improves cross-population transcriptome prediction for transcriptome-wide association studies in underrepresented populations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Family History Data to Improve the Power of Association Studies: Application to Cancer in UK Biobank 93%
- Genome-wide pleiotropy analysis identifies novel blood pressure variants and improves its polygenic risk scores 93%
- Meta-MultiSKAT: Multiple phenotype meta-analysis for region-based association test 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.