Back

Enhancing Evolutionary Timelines: The Impact of Stratigraphic Range Information on Phylogenetic Inference

Stolz, U.; Gavryushkina, A.; Vaughan, T. G.; Stadler, T.; Allen, B. J.

2025-04-22 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.04.17.649084 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coherent phylogenetic analyses of molecular and fossil datasets have deepened our understanding of evolutionary biology. A core model facilitating such coherent analyses is the fossilised birth-death (FBD) model which directly incorporates fossils within phylogenetic trees. However, a limitation of the FBD model is that it cannot assign multiple fossil occurrences of the same species, limiting our ability to accurately represent age information for species which have been sampled repeatedly. To address this gap, the Stratigraphic Ranges Fossilized Birth-Death (SRFBD) model has recently been introduced. This model can account for sampled strati-graphic ranges and integrate over occurrences within the range, enabling us to include more complete fossil age information within the inference. Here, building upon this mathematical work, we develop a computational method making the model accessible to the community, for more accurate total-evidence inference of dated phylogenetic trees and evolutionary parameters. In particular, we integrate the SRFBD model into BEAST2, facilitating the use of a diverse array of genomic substitution models and the inclusion of both morphological and molecular data when inferring phylogenies. We present a thorough validation of the SRFBD implementation against simulated data. We then demonstrate the differences in posterior parameter estimates and phylogenies when applying FBD and SRFBD models to two example datasets, the Spheniscidae (penguins) and the Canidae (dogs). In both examples, the SRFBD model produces older divergence times, lower diversification and turnover rates, and considerably higher sampling proportions compared to FBD model.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.0%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.4%
6
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
7
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
8
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
13
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
20
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
23
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%