Back

Unused Samples from Clinical Blood Draws as a Resource for Maximizing Research Samples while Mitigating Iatrogenic Anemia Risks: A Pilot Study

Jaffe, I. S.; Aljabban, I.; Kim, J. I.; Dundas, N.; Khalil, K.; Rosa, S.; Zayas, Z.; Nally, M.; Gallego, E.; Griesemer, A.; Montgomery, R. A.; Stern, J. M.

2025-04-18 transplantation
10.1101/2025.04.17.25326023 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranslational research driven by large-scale biological testing requires significant volumes of blood for research testing. However, blood is also required for clinical management of research subjects, which must take priority. Paradoxically, much of the blood drawn for clinical management goes unused. Here, we present our approach for retrieving unused blood samples collected for clinical management and recycling them for research purposes. MethodsClinical Blood samples were collected for 60 days during a 61-day xenotransplantation experiment in a brain-dead decedent. Twice weekly, research staff went to the chemistry and hematology laboratories and collected stored blood, serum, and plasma samples that were >12 hours old. Sample collection and storage before retrieval was per standard clinical protocols. Samples were de-identified and relabeled and brought to a central biorepository for processing and storage. The quantity of plasma, serum, red blood cells (RBCs), and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from clinical labs and bespoke research blood draws were compared. ResultsUnused blood from clinical samples yielded a minimum of 6.0 ml per day of plasma, representing 62% of all plasma obtained. Serum was only recoverable on 13 days (22%), with a mean 2.3 ml collected on those days, representing 8% of all serum obtained. PBMCs were only recoverable on six days (10%). ConclusionsOverdrawn clinical laboratory samples represent an untapped resource of blood samples for research and can help augment samples collected explicitly for research purposes. With careful planning, this represents an opportunity to minimize iatrogenic blood loss in clinical-translational research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.7%
4
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
10
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
21
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%