Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Core Symptoms of Chronic Primary Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials
Telesca, A.; Vergallito, A.; Vedani, A.; Locatelli, G.; Visiello, B.; Lauria Pinter, G.; Romero Lauro, L. J.
Show abstract
Chronic Primary Pain (CPP) is a new diagnostic category including chronic pain conditions lacking clinical signs or a clear etiopathogenetic origin. These disorders may share a common neural mechanism known as central sensitization, where nociceptive neurons become hyper-responsive to standard or subthreshold pain stimuli, resulting in pain hypersensitivity. In this context, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) seems a promising tool to improve CPP symptoms by targeting maladaptive brain activity and connectivity. To date, NIBS effects on CPP symptoms remain unexplored. To fill this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis, investigating the effect of NIBS in improving the three core symptoms of CPP, namely pain intensity, emotional distress, and functional disability. Following PRISMA guidelines, we screened four databases up to the end of January 2023. Thirty-five English-written randomized clinical trials were included, comprising 874 participants assigned to the real stimulation condition and 713 to the sham. Findings highlighted the effect of the real over the sham stimulation in improving CPP core symptoms immediately after the treatment. For pain intensity and functional disability, the improvement persisted also at the one-month follow-up. Meta-regression analyses highlighted that a longer CPP duration reduced the effects of NIBS, while an increased number of sessions was associated with greater pain relief at follow-up. Taken together, our results suggest that NIBS can effectively alleviate CPP symptoms in the short and medium term. Further research is needed to define standardized NIBS protocols for CPP management and explore whether combining NIBS with other therapeutic interventions can enhance effects duration and efficacy.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Management of Central Post-Stroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 97%
- Sensory profiling in classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case-control study revealing pain characteristics, somatosensory changes, and impaired pain modulation 95%
- Modulating Brain Rhythms of Pain using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS)? A Sham-controlled Study in Healthy Human Participants 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hyper-connectivity between the left motor cortex and prefrontal cortex is associated with the severity of dysfunction of the descending pain modulatory system in fibromyalgia 96%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 95%
- Spatial summation of pain is associated with pain expectations: Results from a home-based paradigm 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Convergent neural representations of acute nociceptive pain in healthy volunteers: A large-scale fMRI meta-analysis 94%
- The Stress-Pain Connection in Chronic Primary Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Physiological Stress Markers in Relation to Experimental Pain Responses 94%
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.