Improved Injury Detection Through Harmonizing Multi-Site Neuroimaging Data after Experimental TBI: A Translational Outcomes Project in NeuroTrauma (TOP-NT) Consortium Study
Kislik, G.; Fox, R.; Korotcov, A. V.; Zhou, J.; Febo, M.; Moghadas, B.; Bibic, A.; Zou, Y.; Wan, J.; Koehler, R. C.; Adebayo, T.; Burns, M. P.; McCabe, J. T.; Wang, K. K.; Huie, J. R.; Ferguson, A. R.; Harris, N. G.; The TOP-NT Investigators,
Show abstract
Multi-site neuroimaging studies have become increasingly common in order to generate larger samples of reproducible data to answer questions associated with smaller effect sizes. The data harmonization model NeuroCombat has been shown to remove site effects introduced by differences in site-related technical variance while maintaining group differences, yet its effect on improving statistical power in pre-clinical models of CNS disease is unclear. The present study examined fractional anisotropy data computed from diffusion weighted imaging data at 3 and 30 days post-controlled cortical impact injury from 184 adult rats across four sites as part of the Translational-Outcome-Project-in-Neurotrauma (TOP-NT) Consortium. Findings confirmed prior clinical reports that NeuroCombat fails to remove site effects in data containing a high proportion-of-outliers (>5%) and skewness, which introduced significant variation in non-outlier sites. After removal of one outlier site and harmonization using a global sham population, harmonization displayed an increase in effect size in data that displayed group level effects (p<0.01) in both univariate and voxel-level volumes of pathology. This was characterized by movement toward similar distributions in voxel measurements (Kolmogorov-Smirnov p<<0.001 to >0.01) and statistical power increases within the ipsilateral cortex. Harmonization improved statistical power and frequency of significant differences in areas with existing group differences, thus improving the ability to detect regions affected by injury rather than by other confounds. These findings indicate the utility of NeuroCombat in reproducible data collection, where biological differences can be accurately revealed to allow for greater reliability in multi-site neuroimaging studies. Significance StatementThis project demonstrates the utility of NeuroCombat in reducing site effects in multi-site rodent imaging. We also demonstrate that harmonization improves the ability to distinguish between sham and injured rats at the voxel level and increase statistical power and effect size in areas of injury. Multi-center studies are becoming more common to allow for increased efficiency in data collection, and with conservative approaches and analysis into the datasets, NeuroCombat can be utilized to improve study reliability and reproducibility.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct and specific assessment of axonal injury and spinal cord microenvironments using diffusion correlation imaging 94%
- Sex matters: the MouseX DW-ALLEN Atlas for mice diffusion-weighted MR imaging 94%
- The macaque brain ONPRC18 template with combined gray and white matter labelmap for multimodal neuroimaging studies of nonhuman primates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Unbiased Population-Based Statistics to Obtain Pathologic Burden of Injury after Experimental TBI 98%
- Acute treatment with TrkB agonist LM22A-4 confers neuroprotection and preserves myelin integrity in a mouse model of pediatric traumatic brain injury 92%
- Progressively reduced cerebral oxygen metabolism and elevated plasma NfL levels in the zQ175DN mouse model of Huntington disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated detection of axonal damage along white matter tracts in acute severe traumatic brain injury 95%
- Fully Automated Detection of Paramagnetic Rims in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3T Susceptibility-Based MR Imaging 94%
- Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensitively Detects and Accurately Quantifies Multiple Sclerosis Lesions 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.