Back
Comparison of Three Next Generation Sequencers on Their Basecall Error Rates and Bias Patterns
Yao, T.
2025-04-20
genomics
10.1101/2025.04.15.649007
bioRxiv
Show abstract
Withdrawal StatementThe authors have withdrawn this manuscript because the one or more of the authors did not agree with publishing this manuscript. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
●Non-profit
◐University press
○Commercial
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
1
PLOS ONE
●
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
8.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Genomics
○
406 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards a better understanding of the low recall of insertion variants with short-read based variant callers 91%
- Flexible, Production-Scale, Human Whole Genome Sequencing On A Benchtop Sequencer 91%
- Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods 90%
3
Genome Biology
○
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
- A recurrent sequencing artifact on Illumina sequencers with two-color fluorescent dye chemistry and its impact on somatic variant detection 91%
- Benchmarking of computational error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing data 91%
- Automated quality control of next generation sequencing data using machine learning 91%
4
Scientific Reports
○
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
- ConsensuSV-ONT - a modern method for accurate structural variant calling 92%
- Optimised multiplex amplicon sequencing for mutation identification using the MinION nanopore sequencer 91%
- GeneToCN: An Alignment-Free Method for Gene Copy Number Estimation Directly from Next-Generation Sequencing Reads 91%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
○
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance analysis of conventional and AI-based variant callers using short and long reads 92%
- Prior knowledge on context-driven DNA fragmentation probabilities can improve de novo genome assembly algorithms 91%
- A comparison of three programming languages for a full-fledged next-generation sequencing tool 91%
50% of probability mass above
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.