Single cell multi-omic whole genome sequencing and chromatin accessibility profiling reveals genome-epigenome coevolution in colorectal cancer
Mossner, M.; Colson, C.; Guo, Q.; Whiting, F.; Grant, H.; Stafford, A.; Kyle, P.; Donato-Brown, D.; Murphy, J.; Sottoriva, A.; Baker, A.-M.; Graham, T.
Show abstract
Epigenetic alterations co-evolve with genetic mutations to drive carcinogenesis and treatment response. Resolving genome-epigenome coevolution requires accurate multi-omic single cell measurement. Here we develop a new technology called "double ATAC" (dATAC) for high-throughput, high-quality, concurrent whole genome sequencing and chromatin accessibility profiling of individual somatic cells. dATAC is a "one pot" method that uses two rounds of tagmentation to sequentially label open chromatin regions and then the whole genome, and produces data of the same quality as current leading single-omic methods. Using colorectal cancer as a model system, we apply dATAC to reveal convergent reorganisation of the epigenome across expanding drug-resistant clones during 5-FU chemotherapy exposure, remarkable stoichiometry of chromatin accessibility at somatic copy number alterations, and the clonal expansion of copy-number altered T cells in the stroma of metastatic disease. dATAC is a robust single cell technology to accurately profile genome-epigenome coevolution across tissues, diseases and species.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanism of homology search expansion during recombinational DNA break repair 96%
- PAX3-FOXO1 coordinates enhancer architecture, eRNA transcription, andRNA polymerase pause release at select gene targets 96%
- Systematic Dissection of Sequence Features Affecting the Binding Specificity of a Pioneer Factor Reveals Binding Synergy Between FOXA1 and AP-1 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.