A Systematic Review of Female Athletes in Concussion Research: Gaps, Findings, and Future Directions
Gutterman, S.; Edelstein, R.; Van Horn, J. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite the growing participation of female athletes in contact and high-impact sports, their representation in concussion research remains disproportionately low. This imbalance limits the generalizability of clinical guidelines and return-to-play (RTP) protocols, potentially compromising athlete safety and recovery outcomes. MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted on concussion studies published between 2021 and 2024 to assess changes in female representation. The analysis focused on three key objectives: (i) identifying primary research areas in concussion studies, (ii) evaluating the prevalence of female participants, and (iii) determining whether sample sizes were sufficient for statistically meaningful, sex-specific conclusions. ResultsA regression analysis revealed a statistically significant decline in female representation over time (B =-0.2478, p <.001), and female participant numbers decreasing 25% yearly and by 31% between 2021 and 2024. The female-to-male ratio analysis confirmed that male sample sizes continue to dominate, reinforcing the reliance on male-centric data in concussion assessment and RTP decision-making. Additionally, while generalized linear models remain widely used for broad comparisons, traditional statistical methods often fail to capture nuanced sex-based differences, particularly given the persistent sample size disparities. ConclusionThis review underscores the continued underrepresentation of female athletes in concussion research and the reliance on male-driven data for clinical decision-making. Although efforts to include female participants have increased, sample sizes remain insufficient for robust, sex-specific analyses. Addressing these gaps is critical for developing evidence-based, individualized concussion recovery models that account for the unique neurobiological and biomechanical profiles of female athletes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven prediction of spinal cord injury recovery: an exploration of current status and future perspectives 89%
- Proportional recovery in mice with cortical stroke 88%
- Delayed viral vector mediated delivery of neurotrophin-3 improves skilled hindlimb function and stability after thoracic contusion in rats 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 95%
- Subconcussive head impact exposure differences between drill intensities in U.S. high school football 94%
- Self-reported concussion history is not related to cortical volume in college athletes. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying paddling kinematic through muscle activation and whole body coordination during maximal sprint of different duration on a kayak ergometer: a pilot study 91%
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 91%
- The effect of breaking up sedentary time with calisthenics on neuromuscular function: a preliminary study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterization of cognitive-motor function in women who have experienced intimate partner violence-related brain injury 93%
- Subconcussive preconditioning prevents microglial morphology changes and improves cognitive outcomes in mice 93%
- Objective turning measures improve diagnostic accuracy and relate to real-world mobility/combat readiness in chronic mild traumatic brain injury 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.