Transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomisation exploring dynamic CD4+ T cell gene expression in colorectal cancer development
Deslandes, B.; Wu, X.; Lee, M. A.; Goudswaard, L. J.; Jones, G. W.; Gsur, A.; Lindblom, A.; Ogino, S.; Vymetalkova, V.; Wolk, A.; Wu, A. H.; Huyghe, J. R.; Peters, U.; Phipps, A. I.; Thomas, C. E.; Pai, R. K.; Grant, R. C.; Buchanan, D. D.; Yarmolinksy, J.; Gunter, M. J.; Zheng, J.; Hazelwood, E.; Vincent, E. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundRecent research has identified a potential protective effect of higher numbers of circulating lymphocytes on colorectal cancer (CRC) development. However, the importance of different lymphocyte subtypes and activation states in CRC development and the biological pathways driving this relationship remain poorly understood and warrant further investigation. Specifically, CD4+ T cells - a highly dynamic lymphocyte subtype - undergo remodelling upon activation to induce the expression of genes critical for their effector function. Previous studies investigating their role in CRC risk have used bulk tissue, limiting our current understanding of the role of these cells to static, non-dynamic relationships only. MethodsHere, we combined two genetic epidemiological methods - Mendelian randomisation (MR) and genetic colocalisation - to evaluate evidence for causal relationships of gene expression on CRC risk across multiple CD4+ T cell subtypes and activation stage. Genetic proxies were obtained from single-cell transcriptomic data, allowing us to investigate the causal effect of expression of 1,805 genes across five CD4+ T cell activation states on CRC risk (78,473 cases; 107,143 controls). We repeated analyses stratified by CRC anatomical subsites and sex, and performed a sensitivity analysis to evaluate whether the observed effect estimates were likely to be CD4+ T cell-specific. ResultsWe identified six genes with evidence (FDR-P<0.05 in MR analyses and H4>0.8 in genetic colocalisation analyses) for a causal role of CD4+ T cell expression in CRC development - FADS2, FHL3, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB5, RPL28, and TMEM258. We observed differences in causal estimates of gene expression on CRC risk across different CD4+ T cell subtypes and activation timepoints, as well as CRC anatomical subsites and sex. However, our sensitivity analysis revealed that the genetic proxies used to instrument gene expression in CD4+ T cells also act as eQTLs in other tissues, highlighting the challenges of using genetic proxies to instrument tissue-specific expression changes. ConclusionsOur study demonstrates the importance of capturing the dynamic nature of CD4+ T cells in understanding disease risk, and prioritises genes for further investigation in cancer prevention research.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Separating the effects of early and later life adiposity on colorectal cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study 94%
- Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis 91%
- Single cell analysis of menstrual endometrial tissues defines phenotypes associated with endometriosis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new highly-specific Natural Killer cell-specific gene signature predicting recurrence in colorectal cancer patients. 94%
- A functional genomics approach to understand host genetic regulation of COVID-19 severity 94%
- A novel approach to digital characterisation of Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in colorectal cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- GWAS and 3D chromatin mapping identifies multicancer risk genes associated with hormone-dependent cancers 94%
- Wild-type bone marrow cells repopulate tissue resident macrophages and reverse the impacts of homozygous CSF1R mutation. 93%
- Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies causal links between blood proteins and severe COVID-19 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.