Back

Genetic subtypes predict multiple sclerosis severity and response to treatment

Kreft, K. L.; Mekkes, N.; Uzochukwu, E. C.; Loveless, S.; Wynford-Thomas, R.; Harding, K.; Wardle, M.; Holmans, P. C.; Brown, J. W.; Lawton, M.; Tallantyre, E. C.; Holtman, I.; Robertson, N.

2025-04-17 neurology
10.1101/2025.04.15.25325853 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPredicting response to treatment and risk of long-term disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging. In other disease areas, combining genetic risk variants enabled detection of relevant clinical endophenotypes associated with important outcomes, but this has never been applied to MS. MethodsWe applied unsupervised hierarchical clustering to genomic risk scores of two cohorts (the prospective cohort study of 1455 Welsh MS patients was used as the discovery cohort and replication was performed in a multi-centre post-mortem Netherlands Brain Bank cohort of 272 MS patients) to predict relevant disease outcomes using survival analysis for time to disability milestones (expanded disability status scale, EDSS), and ANOVA to compare linear clinical outcomes. ResultsThree genomic clusters were identified, in each cluster patients had similar genetic profiles. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between clusters. Welsh patients in cluster 1 attained key disability milestones later, reaching EDSS6, 6 years later (p=0.003) and EDSS8, 13 years later (p=0.02) than those in clusters 2 and 3. Time to EDSS6 was also significantly longer for patients in cluster 1 versus cluster 2 in the NBB-MS cohort (6 years, p=0.04). Genomic clustering is an independent predictor for disease progression compared with well-validated risk factors (Hazard ratio for time to EDSS6 1.3-2.0, all p<0.05). Welsh patients in cluster 2 and 3 also had a significantly greater annual increase in T2 lesion load on serial MR imaging (p=0.04). In cluster 2, patients who had received MS disease modifying treatments (DMT) had a longer time to EDSS6 (p=0.003) compared to those that had received no DMTs, whereas no differences were observed in either cluster 1 or cluster 3. In the NBB-MS cohort, we also observed differences in symptomatology, including earlier development of swallowing problems (p=0.02) or muscle spasticity (p= 0.0008) in cluster 2 patients. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that unsupervised genetic clustering has utility to detect clinically relevant endophenotypes of MS, with genetic cluster 2 patients having a more severe phenotype and higher risk of disability. Moreover, genetic stratification is able to predict response to DMTs and could potentially be used for precision medicine in MS management.

Published in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery &amp; Psychiatry · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
3
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
9
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
14
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
21
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%