Back

Multi-Omic Profiling Reveals Epigenetic Drivers of Immunotherapy Resistance in Multiple Myeloma

Härtle, L.; Cuenda, N. B.; Villena Gonzalez, F. J.; Espejo Diaz, I.; Campo, P. L. d.; Rosa-Rosa, J. M.; Fernandez, R. A. A.; Munoz, M. N. L.; Sanchez-Pina, J. M.; Garcia-Ortiz, A.; Valeri, A.; Barrio, S.; Al-Shahrour, F.; Bassermann, F.; Martinez-Lopez, J.; Di Domenico, T.

2025-04-19 oncology
10.1101/2025.04.15.25325788 medRxiv
Show abstract

Targeted immunotherapies against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have transformed the treatment landscape of Multiple Myeloma (MM). Fc receptor-like 5 (FCRL5) has emerged as an alternative target. However, resistance frequently emerges within months, posing a significant clinical challenge. Structural alterations and mutations in BCMA only account for the minority of cases and insights into BCMA antigen escape remain largely unknown. This study investigates novel (epi)genetic mechanisms of antigen escape through comprehensive multi-omic Oxford Nanopore profiling of sequential pre-treatment and relapse samples. We identify acquired DNA-hypermethylation across the entire BCMA gene, and hypermethylation of the FCRL5 promoter, both resulting in epigenetic gene silencing as novel resistance mechanisms through which MM cells evade therapy. These findings underscore the dynamic clonal evolution of MM under therapeutic pressure and highlight the critical role of epigenetic modifications in resistance. Furthermore, we demonstrate the potential of advanced sequencing technologies for capturing epigenetic and complex genomic alterations in clinical settings, paving the way for personalized treatment strategies and predictive biomarkers for early resistance detection. Statement of significanceAcquired DNA hypermethylation of BCMA and FCRL5 regulatory regions, leading to gene expression downregulation, represent novel epigenetic resistance mechanisms to anti-BCMA and anti-FCRL5 immunotherapies. Furthermore, DNA methylation marks serve as a molecular memory of therapeutic pressure, capturing the treatment history of cancer cells.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
11.8%
3
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.0%
4
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Blood Cancer Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
6
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
15
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
16
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
22
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
26
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%