Give It Time: Green Anacondas Show Prolonged Behavioral Responses to Enclosure Enhancements
Carvalho, J.; Poinho, M. I.; Morello, G.; Ramos, F.; Magalhaes, A.
Show abstract
Information about green anacondas (Eunectes murinus) in human care is limited, especially concerning their behavior, welfare, and overall well-being. To help bridge this knowledge gap, this study evaluated how exhibit design enhancements influence E. murinus behavior. The aim was to assess immediate behavioral changes following enclosure modifications and investigate potential habituation over time, ultimately evaluating the effectiveness and longevity of the behavioral changes induced by the improved environment. Systematic observations were divided into three phases: before enclosure improvements, immediately after these modifications, and three weeks later. Enclosure modifications focused on areas less frequented by the anacondas during Phase 1. Results revealed decreased inactivity in Phase 2 and more balanced space use in Phase 3, with anacondas occupying previously underutilized areas, including the terrariums vertical dimension. Interaction with exhibit enhancement items increased in the studys final phase, where a decrease in engagement would be anticipated due to habituation. These results suggested the anacondas required additional time to acclimate to the modifications, even though environmental factors may have contributed to these changes. This study highlights how enclosure enhancements may benefit green anacondas welfare while underlining the importance of providing sufficient acclimation time to accurately evaluate the animals complete behavioral response. Simple SummaryGreen anacondas (Eunectes murinus) remain largely understudied, particularly in terms of their behavior and welfare in human care. To address this knowledge gap, improvements were made to the enclosure of green anacondas in captivity, and their behaviors were observed before and after the modifications. The observations were divided into three phases: before the changes (Phase 1), immediately after (Phase 2), and approximately three weeks later (Phase 3). The modifications focused on areas that were rarely utilized during Phase 1. After the improvements, the anacondas became more active and used their enclosure more evenly, including at varying heights. The anacondas interacted more with the new enclosure features after the three weeks, when increased disinterest would have been expected, although environmental conditions may have influenced these changes. These findings show how enclosure modifications may help enhance the welfare of green anacondas and emphasize the need for research that allows enough time for the animals to fully adjust, ensuring a complete understanding of their response.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Animal-appropriate housing of ball pythons (Python regius)-- Behavior-based evaluation of two types of housing systems 97%
- Movement ecology of captive-bred axolotls in restored and artificial wetlands: conservation insights for amphibian reintroductions and translocations 96%
- Influence of enclosure design on the behaviour and welfare of Pogona vitticeps 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Wild raccoons are more innovative but not bolder than another ecological generalist, the Virginia opossum, on a pull-string task 94%
- Too hot or too disturbed? Temperatures more than hikers affect circadian activity of females in northern chamois 94%
- The role of visual and olfactory cues in social decisions of guppies and zebrafish 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding feeding competition under laboratory conditions: Rohu (Labeo rohita) versus Amazon sailfin catfish (Pterygoplichthys spp.) 94%
- Observation of female-male mounting in the carrion crow 93%
- Domestication effects on aggressiveness: Comparison of biting motivation and bite force between wild and domesticated finches 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.