Towards a diagnostic test for sporadic ALS utilising deep learning and SNP microarrays
Hu, J.; Pain, O.; Al Khleifat, A.; Shatunov, A.; Andersen, P. M.; Basak, N. A.; Cooper-Knock, J.; Corcia, P.; Couratier, P.; de Carvalho, M.; Drory, V.; Glass, J. D.; Gotkine, M.; Hardiman, O.; Landers, J. E.; McLaughlin, R.; Mora Pardina, J. S.; Morrison, K. E.; Pinto, S.; Povedano, M.; Shaw, C. E.; Shaw, P. J.; Silani, V.; Ticozzi, N.; van Damme, P.; van den Berg, L. H.; Vourc'h, P.; Weber, M.; Veldink, J. H.; ALS Sequencing Consortium, P. M.; Dobson, R. J. B.; Schonhuth, A.; Al-Chalabi, A.; Iacoangeli, A.
Show abstract
A variety of common and rare genetic factors have been implicated in the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and the evidence is that a genetic component is present in most affected individuals. However, our current understanding of ALS genetics causally explains only a small proportion of sporadic cases which represent over 90% of all people with ALS. This limits the utility of genetic testing in screening, diagnosis and management to the 15-20% of people with ALS who carry a known pathogenic variant. Capsule Networks (CapsNets) constitute a deep learning method that has demonstrated strong performance in using genotyping data to predict individuals at risk for ALS. However, their use is constrained by a lack of generalised, flexible, and validated implementations across comprehensive datasets that account for the technical, biological, and clinical heterogeneity found in real-world disease scenarios. In this study, we build upon this method to address existing limitations, to develop a new model that is validated across diverse ALS populations, can handle discrepancies between genotyping technologies, and is applicable to individual external samples. Using large-scale datasets from over 47,000 individuals from 13 countries, genotyped with nine different genotyping platforms, our model achieved high precision and sensitivity in distinguishing between individuals with ALS and non-affected controls. Moreover, in simulations of population screening for ALS, its performance was comparable to that of conventional genetic screening for known ALS gene mutations, such as FUS and C9orf72. Our results demonstrate that this flexible and validated method could support the development of a genetic screening test for identifying individuals at risk and expediting ALS diagnosis. This would be applicable to all individuals, regardless of their family history or presence of known ALS mutations.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial 93%
- Assessing the performance of genome-wide association studies for predicting disease risk 92%
- c-Triadem: A constrained, explainable deep learning model to identify novel biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- System-level analysis of genes mutated in muscular dystrophies reveals a functional pattern associated with muscle weakness distribution 92%
- Assessing agreement between different polygenic risk scores in the UK Biobank 91%
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Poking COVID-19: insights on genomic constraints among immune-related genes between Qatari and Italian populations 91%
- Exploring the impact of mitonuclear discordance on disease in Latin American admixed populations 91%
- Association of common genetic variants in the CPSF7 and SDHAF2 genes with Canine Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in the West Highland White Terrier 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calculating variant penetrance using family history of disease and population data Authorship 93%
- Finding associations in a heterogeneous setting: Statistical test for aberration enrichment 91%
- Multi-Tissue Neocortical Transcriptome-Wide Associations Study Implicates 8 Genes Across 6 Genomic Loci in Alzheimer's Disease 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.