Back

Systematic modulation of sensorimotor learning by domain-specific working memory

O'Bryan, S. R.; Liddy, J. J.; Song, J.-H.

2025-04-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.11.648414 bioRxiv
Show abstract

People differ in how quickly they learn and adapt sensorimotor skills, and these differences have been linked to individual variation in working memory capacity (WMc). In tasks that can be supported by cognitive strategies, visuospatial WMc has been proposed as a key contributor. However, it remains unclear whether this association reflects domain-specific mechanisms or domain-general executive resources, and whether it extends beyond spatial memory to other visual features. Here, we systematically tested whether domain-specific or domain-general WMc predicts adaptation across three visuomotor adaptation (VMA) tasks known to differentially engage explicit and implicit learning systems. After obtaining independent measures of spatial and feature-based WMc, healthy subjects completed (1) a standard VMA task, which engages both explicit and implicit learning systems; (2) a delayed feedback VMA task, which isolates explicit learning; and (3) a clamped feedback VMA task, which isolates implicit learning. Our results provide converging evidence in support of a domain-specific association between spatial WMc and individual differences in learning. In Experiments 1 and 2, greater spatial WMc was associated with robust increases in explicit learning whereas featured-based WMc was not associated with learning outcomes. Surprisingly, in Experiment 3, greater spatial WMc was associated with reduced implicit learning, suggesting an interaction between latent cognitive capacities and implicit learning not accounted for by traditional models. These results shed light on the precise cognitive mechanisms underlying sensorimotor adaptation and provide novel insight into domain-specific links between spatial WM and motor learning.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.8%
3
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
9
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
11
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
13
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
15
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
18
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
23
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%