Back

Generating the head direction signal: Two types of head direction cells in the lateral mammillary and dorsal tegmental nuclei.

Taube, J. S.; Butler, W. M.; Dumont, J. R.; Graham, J. A.; Marcroft, J. L.; Shinder, M. E.; Stackman, R. W.; Yoder, R. M.

2025-04-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.11.648409 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Head direction (HD) cells discharge as a function of the animals directional heading and are believed to underlie ones sense of direction. They have been identified in several brain areas, although the signal is thought to be generated across the connections between the lateral mammillary (LMN) and dorsal tegmental nuclei (DTN). Computational models have proposed that a ring-attractor network underlies the mechanisms that generate the signal. These models usually contain separate populations of neurons that encode HD and angular head velocity (AHV). Currently, both cell types have been identified in the LMN and DTN. However, HD attractor models also require cells, referred to as rotation cells, which are sensitive to both parameters conjunctively (HD+AHV). Here we sought to identify such cells in the LMN-DTN network. We identified two distinct types of HD cells. The majority of LMN HD cells ([~]64%) were AHV-independent, responding only to the animals directional heading. However, a second population ([~]36%) was sensitive to both HD and AHV. Both symmetric and asymmetric AHV cell types were found. Similar results were found in the DTN, but with a higher percentage of conjunctive HD+AHV cells (60%). Notably, many HD+AHV conjunctive cells were also sensitive to the animals linear velocity (LV). In contrast, HD cells in the anterodorsal thalamus were rarely sensitive to AHV or LV. These findings demonstrate that the requisite rotation-type HD cell is present in brain areas responsible for generating the HD signal and supports the view that an attractor style network underlies its generation in mammals. Statements and DeclaratioThis manuscript does not represent the official view of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (USA) (NINDS), the National Institutes of Health (USA) (NIH), or any part of the US Federal Government. No official support or endorsement of this article by the NINDS or NIH is intended or should be inferred.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 7%
12.4%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.4%
3
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
4
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
5
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.7%
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
8
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.1%
10
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.3%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
13
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
15
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Journal of Comparative Neurology
73 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%