Primary care functional features in China and their relationship with health service outcomes: a 15-year mixed methods systematic review protocol
Wang, Y.; Jin, H.; Yu, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionGlobally, primary care (PC) features like accessibility, continuity, and coordination enhance health outcomes. In China, 940,000 public facilities delivered 4.266 billion PC visits in 2022 (50.68% of total visits), focusing on chronic disease management and public health. Unlike Western gatekeeper models, Chinas PC lacks this structure, influencing its characteristics and effectiveness. ObjectiveThis review synthesises Chinas PC functional features and their relationship with health service outcomes since 2009, combining quantitative and qualitative evidence. MethodsUsing the JBI mixed-methods framework, we will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang Data for studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods). Two reviewers will screen and assess quality with JBI tools (>50% threshold). A convergent segregated approach integrates quantitative data (feature strength, associations with outcomes) with qualitative insights (stakeholder views on features and effects). DiscussionThis review may shed light on the functional features of Chinas primary care system and their relationship with health service outcomes. The synthesized evidence could inform clinical practice, health service delivery, and health policy regarding the health service process of primary care in China, while also identifying areas for future research.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 92%
- To Include or Not to Include? A prescription from the pharmacy on how to use active learning assisted screening in systematic reviews 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 93%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 92%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 90%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 90%
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening and Treatment in Older Adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.