Spatial Clustering of Interface Residues Enhances Few-Shot Prediction of Viral Protein Binding
Basse, M.; Wang, D.; Shakhnovich, E.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWPredicting protein binding affinities across large combinatorial mutation spaces remains a critical challenge in molecular biology, particularly for understanding viral evolution and antibody interactions. While combinatorial mutagenesis experiments provide valuable data for training predictive models, they are typically limited due to experimental constraints. This creates a significant gap in our ability to predict the effects of more extensive mutation combinations, such as those observed in emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. We present PROXICLUST, which strategically combines smaller combinatorial mutagenesis experiments to enable accurate predictions across larger combinatorial spaces. Our approach leverages the spatial proximity of amino acid residues to identify potential epistatic interactions, using these relationships to optimize the design of manageable-sized combinatorial experiments. By combining just two small combinatorial datasets, we achieve accurate binding affinity predictions across substantially larger mutation spaces (R2 {approx} 0.8), with performance strongly correlated with capture of high-order epistatic effects. We validated our method in five different protein-protein interaction datasets, including binding of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) to various antibodies and cellular receptors, as well as influenza RBD- antibody interactions. This work provides a practical framework for extending the predictive power of combinatorial mutagenesis beyond current experimental constraints, offering applications in viral surveillance and antibody engineering.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.