Back

Characterizing subtypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HeartMagic prospective observational study

Meyer, P.; Rocca, A.; Banus, J.; Ogier, A. C.; Georgantas, C.; Calarnou, P.; Fatima, A.; Vallee, J.-P.; Deux, J.-F.; Thomas, A.; Marquis, J.; Monney, P.; Lu, H.; Ledoux, J.-B.; Tillier, C.; Crowe, L. A.; Abdurashidova, T.; Richiardi, J.; Hullin, R.; van Heeswijk, R. B.

2025-04-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.04.10.25325567
Show abstract

IntroductionHeart failure (HF) is a life-threatening syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality. While evidence-based drug treatments have effectively reduced morbidity and mortality in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), few therapies have been demonstrated to improve outcomes in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The multifaceted clinical presentation is one of the main reasons why the current understanding of HFpEF remains limited. This may be caused by the existence of several HFpEF disease subtypes that each need different treatments. There is therefore an unmet need for a holistic approach that combines comprehensive imaging with metabolomic, transcriptomic and genomic mapping to subtype HFpEF patients. This protocol details the approach employed in the HeartMagic study to address this gap in understanding. MethodsThis prospective multi-center observational cohort study will include 500 consecutive patients with actual or recent hospitalization for treatment of HFpEF at two Swiss university hospitals, along with 50 age-matched HFrEF patients and 50 age-matched healthy controls. Diagnosis of heart failure is based on clinical signs and symptoms and subgrouping HF patients is based on the left-ventricular ejection fraction. In addition to routine clinical workup, participants undergo genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses, while the anatomy, composition, and function of the heart are quantified by comprehensive echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Quantitative MRI is also applied to characterize the kidney. The primary outcome is a composite of one-year cardiovascular mortality or rehospitalization. Machine learning (ML) based multi-modal clustering will be employed to identify distinct HFpEF subtypes in the holistic data. The clinical importance of these subtypes shall be evaluated based on their association with the primary outcome. Statistical analysis will include group comparisons across modalities, survival analysis for the primary outcome, and integrative multi-modal clustering combining clinical, imaging, ECG, genomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic data to identify and validate HFpEF subtypes. DiscussionThe integration of comprehensive MRI with extensive genomic and metabolomic profiling in this study will result in an unprecedented panoramic view of HFpEF and should enable us to distinguish functional subgroups of HFpEF patients. This approach has the potential to provide unprecedented insights on HFpEF disease and should provide a basis for personalized therapies. Beyond this, identifying HFpEF subtypes with specific molecular and structural characteristics could lead to new targeted pharmacological interventions, with the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Matching journals

1
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
#1
169× avg
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 1%
23× avg
3
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 24%
1.5× avg
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 4%
9.8× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 63%
6.3%
6
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
45× avg
7
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.7%
31× avg
8
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 3%
9.2× avg
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
10
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.4%
40× avg
11
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
12
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
13
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 9%
2.7× avg
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 7%
4.1× avg
15
Biomedicines
MDPI AG · based on 21 published papers
Top 0.9%
18× avg
16
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 29%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 4%
6.0× avg
19
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
20
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
6.9× avg
21
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
22
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 45%
1.3%
23
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 3%
12× avg
24
Hypertension
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 20 published papers
Top 3%
7.5× avg
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 21 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
26
EBioMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 21 published papers
Top 3%
6.4× avg