Back

CLOOSE: An open-source platform for optical closed-loop experiments

Francioni, V.; Beltramini, A.; Fan, L. Z.; Harnett, M. T.

2025-04-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.04.09.648061 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) have catalyzed advancements in both clinical applications and basic neuroscience research. However, technical barriers such as steep learning curves and complex synchronization requirements often impede their widespread adoption. In response to the increasing demand for optical BCI experiments and to the technical challenges associated with their implementation, we introduce CLOOSE (Closed-loop Optical Open-Source Experiments), a versatile platform designed to standardize, simplify, and accelerate closed-loop experiments with functional imaging data. CLOOSE interfaces easily with any frame-based imaging system via TCP/IP, allowing for real-time data streaming and distributed computation. Benchmark tests validate CLOOSEs real-time accuracy in image registration, signal processing, and analysis at imaging frequencies [≥]1 kHz, making it the first optical BCI compatible with voltage indicators. Throughout the paper we showcase CLOOSEs versatility in supporting several neurofeedback paradigms: from single neuron to population dynamics, multiplane imaging, and online (and offline) z-tracking. CLOOSEs functionality is easily accessible to users with minimal coding experience through an intuitive graphical interface for experiment setup and real-time performance monitoring. By significantly lowering the barrier to performing technically demanding closed-loop experiments, CLOOSE advances the streamlining, standardization, and democratization of online image analysis and neurofeedback BCI paradigms, opening new avenues for precise manipulation and real-time readout of neuronal activity in health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.