Back

Chemical inhibition of RPA gap protection sensitizes BRCA1-deficient cancers to PARP inhibition

VanderVere-Carozza, P. S.; Jordan, M. R.; Garrett, J. E.; Pollok, K. E.; Hinshaw, H. D.; Sulaiman, X.; Liu, S.; Wan, J.; Pawelczak, K. S.; Turchi, J. J.

2025-04-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.04.09.647957 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are standard of care for many BRCA1 deficient cancers, though few cures are achieved. We sought to determine if targeting the protection of the single-strand DNA gaps induced by PARPi in BRCA-deficient cancers could increase efficacy. Replication protein A (RPA) participates in critical protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions to protect single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and support DNA metabolism. We have reported the optimization of small molecule RPA inhibitors (RPAi) that target protein-ssDNA interactions to chemically exhaust RPA and elicit single-agent anticancer activity. RPAi sensitizes cells to PARPi in BRCA1-deficient non-cancerous cells, where ssDNA gap formation drives therapeutic efficacy. We show that RPAi treatment abolishes PARPi-induced replication gap protection, resulting in genomic instability via replication fork degradation and chromosomal integrity, and that, in vivo, the RPA and PARP targeted combination abrogates cancer growth in a BRCA1-mutant breast cancer model. We find that genetic predispositions to ssDNA gap accumulation correlate with RPAi sensitivity, and BRCA1-proficient cells remain sensitive to combination treatment but require more PARP inhibition to increase ssDNA gaps. RPAi-PARPi combination activity in patient-derived ovarian cancer models demonstrates the utility of targeting gap protection to increase PARPi sensitivity and circumvent resistance. Collectively, this work provides a unifying mechanism of chemical RPA exhaustion as a cancer therapeutic strategy. One Sentence SummaryInhibition of single-strand DNA gap protection potentiates PARP targeted treatment of BRCA1 deficient cancers.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
4
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
6
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Redox Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.1%
11
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
17
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
19
NAR Cancer
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.3%
22
DNA Repair
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
24
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
27
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%