Back

The role of mating systems in postzygotic reproductive isolation between two recently divergent Aquilegia Species

Ma, Y.; Peng, J.; Weng, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z.-Q.

2025-04-15 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.04.09.647901 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mating systems play a crucial role in plant speciation. In particular, hybrid seed inviability is prevalent among species with different mating systems due to parental conflict for resource allocation to offspring. However, whether such a postzygotic barrier can be rapidly established in recently diverged species remains poorly understood. In this study, we integrate population genomic and ecological approaches to address this question using recently diverged species pairs Aquilegia kansuensis and A. ecalcarata, which diverged approximately 0.256 Ma, in a sympatric population from Qinghai, China. Population structure and demographic history results reveal clear genetic differentiation between the two species, corroborating their recent divergence. The results of outcrossing rate estimation based on microsatellite markers indicated that A. kansuensis and A. ecalcarata exhibit high selfing and mixed mating systems, respectively. We performed reciprocal crosses between A. kansuensis and A. ecalcarata and found that A. ecalcarata yielded a very small number of small-sized seeds when selfed A. kansuensis was used as pollen donors, resulting in strong asymmetric reproductive isolation. An approximate Bayesian computation framework identified that approximately 4.6% of genomic loci are associated with reproductive isolation, and gene ontology analyses of these loci highlighted key pathways involved in seed maturation and post-embryonic development. Therefore, our findings provide evidence that A. ecalcarata and A. kansuensis represent a novel case of parental conflict and postzygotic isolation driven by divergent mating systems, suggesting mating systems can play a critical role in rapid plant speciation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.7%
2
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
4
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
13
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
15
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
16
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
17
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
19
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%