Back

Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Sun, B.; Liang, C.; Sun, P.; A, G.; Li, L.; Zhao, L.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; Foo, R. S.; Chan, M. Y.-Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, X.

2025-04-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.04.08.25325498 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsIn ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) are strongly associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, clinical studies have shown that SMuRF-less patients have worse clinical outcomes. Limited research exists in China, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of SMuRF-less patients remain unclear. This study aims to provide insight into the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of SMuRF-less patients in China. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed adult patients with STEMI using data from the China Chest Pain Center database. We examined the impact of SMuRF-less on short-term (0 to 30 days) and long-term (31 to 365 days) mortality. Cox-proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis for short-term and long-term mortality. ResultsOf the 379,811 patients, 87,830 (23.1%) were SMuRF-less. Patients in the SMuRF-less group were older (65 years vs. 63 years), a higher proportion of female (29.4% vs. 23.3%) and less like to receiving reperfusion therapy (81.1% vs. 85.6%). On short-term SMuRFs patients had significantly lower all-cause mortality (5.1% vs 8.7%, hazard ratios (HR) 0.82 [95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.84], P < 0.001). However, on long-term there was no significant difference in mortality between the groups (3.4% vs 3.8%, HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.05; P = 0.841). ConclusionsSMuRF-less patients exhibited higher mortality, particularly within the first 30 days after STEMI onset, with a more pronounced effect observed in male patients. Treatment disparities and delayed care were key contributors to this difference. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=139 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25325498v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (53K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@778aaborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@30ee20org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@61865corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bc1199_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between STEMI patients with SMuRF-less and SMuRFs. SMuRF-less was defined as having no traditional risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, or smoking history), while SMuRFs had [&ge;]1 risk factor. Among STEMI patients, SMuRF-less patients, who accounted for 23% of the cohort, had a higher proportion of females, longer delays to first medical contact (FMC), lower rates of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and reperfusion, and higher short-term mortality compared to SMuRFs (77%). Kaplan-Meier analysis shows lower 30-day mortality in SMuRF-less patients (HR:0.82, 95% CI: 0.80-0.84, P < 0.001), with no significant difference in long-term mortality (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.05, P = 0.841). Abbreviations: STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; SMuRFs, standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors; FMC, first medical contact; GDMT, guideline-directed medical therapy; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Published in European Heart Journal (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.