Back

Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Sun, B.; Liang, C.; Sun, P.; A, G.; Li, L.; Zhao, L.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; Foo, R. S.; Chan, M. Y.-Y.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, X.

2025-04-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.04.08.25325498 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsIn ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) are strongly associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, clinical studies have shown that SMuRF-less patients have worse clinical outcomes. Limited research exists in China, and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of SMuRF-less patients remain unclear. This study aims to provide insight into the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of SMuRF-less patients in China. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed adult patients with STEMI using data from the China Chest Pain Center database. We examined the impact of SMuRF-less on short-term (0 to 30 days) and long-term (31 to 365 days) mortality. Cox-proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier analysis for short-term and long-term mortality. ResultsOf the 379,811 patients, 87,830 (23.1%) were SMuRF-less. Patients in the SMuRF-less group were older (65 years vs. 63 years), a higher proportion of female (29.4% vs. 23.3%) and less like to receiving reperfusion therapy (81.1% vs. 85.6%). On short-term SMuRFs patients had significantly lower all-cause mortality (5.1% vs 8.7%, hazard ratios (HR) 0.82 [95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.84], P < 0.001). However, on long-term there was no significant difference in mortality between the groups (3.4% vs 3.8%, HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.05; P = 0.841). ConclusionsSMuRF-less patients exhibited higher mortality, particularly within the first 30 days after STEMI onset, with a more pronounced effect observed in male patients. Treatment disparities and delayed care were key contributors to this difference. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=139 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25325498v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (53K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@778aaborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@30ee20org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@61865corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bc1199_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between STEMI patients with SMuRF-less and SMuRFs. SMuRF-less was defined as having no traditional risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, or smoking history), while SMuRFs had [&ge;]1 risk factor. Among STEMI patients, SMuRF-less patients, who accounted for 23% of the cohort, had a higher proportion of females, longer delays to first medical contact (FMC), lower rates of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and reperfusion, and higher short-term mortality compared to SMuRFs (77%). Kaplan-Meier analysis shows lower 30-day mortality in SMuRF-less patients (HR:0.82, 95% CI: 0.80-0.84, P < 0.001), with no significant difference in long-term mortality (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.05, P = 0.841). Abbreviations: STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction; SMuRFs, standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors; FMC, first medical contact; GDMT, guideline-directed medical therapy; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
8
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
12
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%