Back

Are there causal associations between obsessive-compulsive disorder and cardiometabolic phenotypes? A genetic correlation and bi-directional Mendelian randomization study

Wootton, R. E.; Crowley, J. J.; Pol-Fuster, J.; Holmberg, A.; Ruck, C. J.; Psychiatry Genomics Consortium Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group, ; Mataix-Cols, D.; Fernandez de la Cruz, L.

2025-04-10 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.04.08.25325472 medRxiv
Show abstract

In epidemiological studies, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is robustly associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic disorders, including cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. However, the mechanisms behind these associations are unclear. We conducted genetic correlation analyses to explore shared genetic etiology and bi-directional summary-level Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore potential causal effects between genetic liability to OCD and 14 cardiometabolic phenotypes (e.g., coronary artery disease, blood pressure, body mass index [BMI]). If causal effects were observed, we planned to conduct multivariable-MR to explore indirect effects via health behaviors. We found no evidence for genetic correlations between OCD and any of the cardiometabolic phenotypes under study, except for a negative correlation with BMI (rG=-0.123, SE=0.029, p<0.001). Summary-level MR showed no evidence for causal effects. Therefore, multivariable-MR was not conducted. We found limited evidence for shared genetic etiology or causal effects. However, we were only powered to detect medium effects in the direction of OCD to cardiometabolic traits, leaving the possibility of smaller causal effects existing. Future studies with larger, more representative samples will help to further interpret findings.

Published in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.