Back

Sacubitril/valsartan Compared to Valsartan in Regressing Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertensive Heart Disease: The REVERSE-LVH Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Lee, V.; Dalakoti, M.; Zheng, Q.; Toh, D.-F.; Boubertakh, R.; Bryant, J. A.; Aw, T.-C.; Lee, C.-H.; Richards, A. M.; Butler, J.; Diez, J.; Foo, R.; Cook, S.; Lam, C.; Le, T.-T.; Chin, C.

2025-04-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.04.08.25325450 medRxiv
Show abstract

Diffuse interstitial fibrosis is associated with adverse outcomes in hypertensive heart disease and may be reversible. Sacubitril/valsartan could offer greater anti-fibrotic effects than valsartan alone. In the REVERSE-LVH phase 2 open-labelled trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT: 03553810; funded by the National Medical Research Council of Singapore), 78 patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were randomized 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan for 52 weeks. Primary endpoint was a change in interstitial volume, assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Despite similar 24-hour systolic blood pressure at 52 weeks (125{+/-}11 vs. 126{+/-}11 mmHg; P=0.379), sacubitril/valsartan resulted in a greater absolute reduction in interstitial volume compared to valsartan (-5.2{+/-}5.4 vs. -2.5{+/-}3.1 mL; P=0.006). Secondary endpoints showed significant differences favoring sacubitril/valsartan in LV mass, left atrial volume, estimated LV filling pressure, and improved cardiac circulating biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin T). Other markers of cardiac volumes, function and mechanics were similar between the two treatment arms. Here we show the potential myocardial benefits of sacubitril/valsartan beyond blood pressure control, though larger studies are needed to confirm their clinical relevance.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #26) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.